Jump to: Complete Features | Incomplete Features | Complete Epics | Incomplete Epics | Other Complete | Other Incomplete |
Note: this page shows the Feature-Based Change Log for a release
These features were completed when this image was assembled
Problem:
Certain Insights Advisor features differentiate between RHEL and OCP advisor
Goal:
Address top priority UI misalignments between RHEL and OCP advisor. Address UI features dropped from Insights ADvisor for OCP GA.
Scope:
Specific tasks and priority of them tracked in https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CCXDEV-7432
This contains all the Insights Advisor widget deliverables for the OCP release 4.11.
Scope
It covers only minor bug fixes and improvements:
Show the error message (mocked in CCXDEV-5868) if the Prometheus metrics `cluster_operator_conditions{name="insights"}` contain two true conditions: UploadDegraded and Degraded at the same time. This state occurs if there was an IO archive upload error = problems with the pipeline.
Expected for 4.11 OCP release.
Scenario: Check if the Insights Advisor widget in the OCP WebConsole UI shows the time of the last data analysis Given: OCP WebConsole UI and the cluster dashboard is accessible And: CCX external data pipeline is in a working state And: administrator A1 has access to his cluster's dashboard And: Insights Operator for this cluster is sending archives When: administrator A1 clicks on the Insights Advisor widget Then: the results of the last analysis are showed in the Insights Advisor widget And: the time of the last analysis is shown in the Insights Advisor widget
Acceptance criteria:
max_over_time(timestamp(changes(insightsclient_request_send_total\{status_code="202"}[1m]) > 0)[24h:1m])
Cloning the existing rule should end up with a new rule in the same namespace.
Modifications can now be done to the new rule.
(Optional) You can silence the existing rule.
Create a new PrometheusRule object inside the namespace that includes the metrics you need to form the alerting rule.
CMO should reconcile the platform Prometheus configuration with the AlertingRule resources.
DoD
CMO should reconcile the platform Prometheus configuration with the alert-relabel-config resources.
DoD
Managing PVs at scale for a fleet creates difficulties where "one size does not fit all". The ability for SRE to deploy prometheus with PVs and have retention based an on a desired size would enable easier management of these volumes across the fleet.
The prometheus-operator exposes retentionSize.
Field | Description |
---|---|
retentionSize | Maximum amount of disk space used by blocks. Supported units: B, KB, MB, GB, TB, PB, EB. Ex: 512MB. |
This is a feature request to enable this configuration option via CMO cluster-monitoring-config ConfigMap.
Today, all configuration for setting individual, for example, routing configuration is done via a single configuration file that only admins have access to. If an environment uses multiple tenants and each tenant, for example, has different systems that they are using to notify teams in case of an issue, then someone needs to file a request w/ an admin to add the required settings.
That can be bothersome for individual teams, since requests like that usually disappear in the backlog of an administrator. At the same time, administrators might get tons of requests that they have to look at and prioritize, which takes them away from more crucial work.
We would like to introduce a more self service approach whereas individual teams can create their own configuration for their needs w/o the administrators involvement.
Last but not least, since Monitoring is deployed as a Core service of OpenShift there are multiple restrictions that the SRE team has to apply to all OSD and ROSA clusters. One restriction is the ability for customers to use the central Alertmanager that is owned and managed by the SRE team. They can't give access to the central managed secret due to security concerns so that users can add their own routing information.
Provide a new API (based on the Operator CRD approach) as part of the Prometheus Operator that allows creating a subset of the Alertmanager configuration without touching the central Alertmanager configuration file.
Please note that we do not plan to support additional individual webhooks with this work. Customers will need to deploy their own version of the third party webhooks.
Team A wants to send all their important notifications to a specific Slack channel.
* CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
* Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
* DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
* DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
* DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
* QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
* QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
* DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>
Now that upstream supports AlertmanagerConfig v1beta1 (see MON-2290 and https://github.com/prometheus-operator/prometheus-operator/pull/4709), it should be deployed by CMO.
DoD:
DoD
DoD
Copy/paste from [_https://github.com/openshift-cs/managed-openshift/issues/60_]
Which service is this feature request for?
OpenShift Dedicated and Red Hat OpenShift Service on AWS
What are you trying to do?
Allow ROSA/OSD to integrate with AWS Managed Prometheus.
Describe the solution you'd like
Remote-write of metrics is supported in OpenShift but it does not work with AWS Managed Prometheus since AWS Managed Prometheus requires AWS SigV4 auth.
Describe alternatives you've considered
There is the workaround to use the "AWS SigV4 Proxy" but I'd think this is not properly supported by RH.
https://mobb.ninja/docs/rosa/cluster-metrics-to-aws-prometheus/
Additional context
The customer wants to use an open and portable solution to centralize metrics storage and analysis. If they also deploy to other clouds, they don't want to have to re-configure. Since most clouds offer a Prometheus service (or it's easy to self-manage Prometheus), app migration should be simplified.
The cluster monitoring operator should allow OpenShift customers to configure remote write with all authentication methods supported by upstream Prometheus.
We will extend CMO's configuration API to support the following authentications with remote write:
Customers want to send metrics to AWS Managed Prometheus that require sigv4 authentication (see https://docs.aws.amazon.com/prometheus/latest/userguide/AMP-secure-metric-ingestion.html#AMP-secure-auth).
Prometheus and Prometheus operator already support sigv4 authentication for remote write. This should be possible to configure the same in the CMO configuration:
apiVersion: v1
kind: ConfigMap
metadata:
name: cluster-monitoring-config
namespace: openshift-monitoring
data:
config.yaml: |
prometheusK8s:
remoteWrite:
- url: "https://remote-write.endpoint"
sigv4:
accessKey:
name: aws-credentialss
key: access
secretKey:
name: aws-credentials
key: secret
profile: "SomeProfile"
roleArn: "SomeRoleArn"
DoD:
Prometheus and Prometheus operator already support custom Authorization for remote write. This should be possible to configure the same in the CMO configuration:
apiVersion: v1
kind: ConfigMap
metadata:
name: cluster-monitoring-config
namespace: openshift-monitoring
data:
config.yaml: |
prometheusK8s:
remoteWrite:
- url: "https://remote-write.endpoint"
Authorization:
type: Bearer
credentials:
name: credentials
key: token
DoD:
As WMCO user, I want to make sure containerd logging information has been updated in documents and scripts.
Configure audit logging to capture login, logout and login failure details
TODO(PM): update this
Customer who needs login, logout and login failure details inside the openshift container platform.
I have checked for this on my test cluster but the audit logs do not contain any user name specifying login or logout details. For successful logins or logout, on CLI and openshift console as well we can see 'Login successful' or 'Invalid credentials'.
Expected results: Login, logout and login failures should be captured in audit logging.
The apiserver pods today have ´/var/log/<kube|oauth|openshift>-apiserver` mounted from the host and create audit files there using the upstream audit event format (JSON lines following https://github.com/kubernetes/apiserver/blob/92392ef22153d75b3645b0ae339f89c12767fb52/pkg/apis/audit/v1/types.go#L72). These events are apiserver specific, but as oauth authentication flow events are also requests, we can use the apiserver event format to log logins, login failures and logouts. Hence, we propose to make oauth-server to create /var/log/oauth-server/audit.log files on the master nodes using that format.
When the login flow does not finish within a certain time (e.g. 10min), we can artificially create an event to show a login failure in the audit logs.
Let the Cluster Authentication Operator deliver the policy to OAuthServer.
In order to know if authn events should be logged, OAuthServer needs to be aware of it.
* Stanislav LázničkaCreate an observer to deliver the audit policy to the oauth server
Make the authentication-operator react to the new audit field in the oauth.config/cluster object. Write an observer watching this field, such an observer will translate the top-level configuration into oauth-server config and add it to the rest of the observed config.
Right now there's no way to generate audit logs from this.
Right now there's no way to generate audit logs from this.
OCP/Telco Definition of Done
Feature Template descriptions and documentation.
Early customer feedback is that they see SNO as a great solution covering smaller footprint deployment, but are wondering what is the evolution story OpenShift is going to provide where more capacity or high availability are needed in the future.
While migration tooling (moving workload/config to new cluster) could be a mid-term solution, customer desire is not to include extra hardware to be involved in this process.
For Telecommunications Providers, at the Far Edge they intend to start small and then grow. Many of these operators will start with a SNO-based DU deployment as an initial investment, but as DUs evolve, different segments of the radio spectrum are added, various radio hardware is provisioned and features delivered to the Far Edge, the Telecommunication Providers desire the ability for their Far Edge deployments to scale up from 1 node to 2 nodes to n nodes. On the opposite side of the spectrum from SNO is MMIMO where there is a robust cluster and workloads use HPA.
Requirement | Notes | isMvp? |
---|---|---|
CI - MUST be running successfully with test automation | This is a requirement for ALL features. | YES |
Release Technical Enablement | Provide necessary release enablement details and documents. | YES |
This Section:
This Section: What does the person writing code, testing, documenting need to know? What context can be provided to frame this feature.
Questions to be addressed:
This is a ticket meant to track all the all the OCP PRs that are involved in the implementation of the SNO + workers enhancement
OCP/Telco Definition of Done
Epic Template descriptions and documentation.
<--- Cut-n-Paste the entire contents of this description into your new Epic --->
Rebase openshift/builder to k8s 1.24
4.11 MVP Requirements
Out of scope use cases (that are part of the Kubeframe/factory project):
Questions to be addressed:
As a deployer, I want to be able to:
so that I can achieve
Currently the Assisted Service generates the credentials by running the ignition generation step of the oepnshift-installer. This is why the credentials are only retrievable from the REST API towards the end of the installation.
In the BILLI usage, which takes down assisted service before the installation is complete there is no obvious point at which to alert the user that they should retrieve the credentials. This means that we either need to:
This requires/does not require a design proposal.
This requires/does not require a feature gate.
The AWS-specific code added in OCPPLAN-6006 needs to become GA and with this we want to introduce a couple of Day2 improvements.
Currently the AWS tags are defined and applied at installation time only and saved in the infrastructure CRD's status field for further operator use, which in turn just add the tags during creation.
Saving in the status field means it's not included in Velero backups, which is a crucial feature for customers and Day2.
Thus the status.resourceTags field should be deprecated in favour of a newly created spec.resourceTags with the same content. The installer should only populate the spec, consumers of the infrastructure CRD must favour the spec over the status definition if both are supplied, otherwise the status should be honored and a warning shall be issued.
Being part of the spec, the behaviour should also tag existing resources that do not have the tags yet and once the tags in the infrastructure CRD are changed all the AWS resources should be updated accordingly.
On AWS this can be done without re-creating any resources (the behaviour is basically an upsert by tag key) and is possible without service interruption as it is a metadata operation.
Tag deletes continue to be out of scope, as the customer can still have custom tags applied to the resources that we do not want to delete.
Due to the ongoing intree/out of tree split on the cloud and CSI providers, this should not apply to clusters with intree providers (!= "external").
Once confident we have all components updated, we should introduce an end2end test that makes sure we never create resources that are untagged.
After that, we can remove the experimental flag and make this a GA feature.
Requirement | Notes | isMvp? |
---|---|---|
CI - MUST be running successfully with test automation | This is a requirement for ALL features. | YES |
Release Technical Enablement | Provide necessary release enablement details and documents. | YES |
List any affected packages or components.
RFE-1101 described user defined tags for AWS resources provisioned by an OCP cluster. Currently user can define tags which are added to the resources during creation. These tags cannot be updated subsequently. The propagation of the tags is controlled using experimental flag. Before this feature goes GA we should define and implement a mechanism to exclude any experimental flags. Day2 operations and deletion of tags is not in the scope.
RFE-2012 aims to make the user-defined resource tags feature GA. This means that user defined tags should be updatable.
Currently the user-defined tags during install are passed directly as parameters of the Machine and Machineset resources for the master and worker. As a result these tags cannot be updated by consulting the Infrastructure resource of the cluster where the user defined tags are written.
The MCO should be changed such that during provisioning the MCO looks up the values of the tags in the Infrastructure resource and adds the tags during creation of the EC2 resources. The MCO should also watch the infrastructure resource for changes and when the resource tags are updated it should update the tags on the EC2 instances without restarts.
Acceptance Criteria:
When this image was assembled, these features were not yet completed. Therefore, only the Jira Cards included here are part of this release
We drive OpenShift cross-market customer success and new customer adoption with constant improvements and feature additions to the existing capabilities of our OpenShift Core Networking (SDN and Network Edge). This feature captures that natural progression of the product.
There are definitely grey areas, but in general:
Questions to be addressed:
User Story: As a customer in a highly regulated environment, I need the ability to secure DNS traffic when forwarding requests to upstream resolvers so that I can ensure additional DNS traffic and data privacy.
Create a PR in openshift/cluster-ingress-operator to implement configurable router probe timeouts.
The PR should include the following:
tldr: three basic claims, the rest is explanation and one example
While bugs are an important metric, fixing bugs is different than investing in maintainability and debugability. Investing in fixing bugs will help alleviate immediate problems, but doesn't improve the ability to address future problems. You (may) get a code base with fewer bugs, but when you add a new feature, it will still be hard to debug problems and interactions. This pushes a code base towards stagnation where it gets harder and harder to add features.
One alternative is to ask teams to produce ideas for how they would improve future maintainability and debugability instead of focusing on immediate bugs. This would produce designs that make problem determination, bug resolution, and future feature additions faster over time.
I have a concrete example of one such outcome of focusing on bugs vs quality. We have resolved many bugs about communication failures with ingress by finding problems with point-to-point network communication. We have fixed the individual bugs, but have not improved the code for future debugging. In so doing, we chase many hard to diagnose problem across the stack. The alternative is to create a point-to-point network connectivity capability. this would immediately improve bug resolution and stability (detection) for kuryr, ovs, legacy sdn, network-edge, kube-apiserver, openshift-apiserver, authentication, and console. Bug fixing does not produce the same impact.
We need more investment in our future selves. Saying, "teams should reserve this" doesn't seem to be universally effective. Perhaps an approach that directly asks for designs and impacts and then follows up by placing the items directly in planning and prioritizing against PM feature requests would give teams the confidence to invest in these areas and give broad exposure to systemic problems.
Relevant links:
In OCP 4.8 the router was changed to use the "random" balancing algorithm for non-passthrough routes by default. It was previously "leastconn".
Bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2007581 shows that using "random" by default incurs significant memory overhead for each backend that uses it.
PR https://github.com/openshift/cluster-ingress-operator/pull/663
reverted the change and made "leastconn" the default again (OCP 4.8 onwards).
The analysis in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2007581#c40 shows that the default haproxy behaviour is to multiply the weight (specified in the route CR) by 16 as it builds its data structures for each backend. If no weight is specified then openshift-router sets the weight to 256. If you have many, many thousands of routes then this balloons quickly and leads to a significant increase in memory usage, as highlighted by customer cases attached to BZ#2007581.
The purpose of this issue is to both explore changing the openshift-router default weight (i.e., 256) to something smaller, or indeed unset (assuming no explicit weight has been requested), and to measure the memory usage within the context of the existing perf&scale tests that we use for vetting new haproxy releases.
It may be that the low-hanging change is to not default to weight=256 for backends that only have one pod replica (i.e., if no value specified, and there is only 1 pod replica, then don't default to 256 for that single server entry).
Outcome: does changing the [default] weight value make it feasible to switch back to "random" as the default balancing algorithm for a future OCP release.
Revert router to using "random" once again in 4.11 once analysis is done on impact of weight and static memory allocation.
Per the 4.6.30 Monitoring DNS Post Mortem, we should add E2E tests to openshift/cluster-dns-operator to reduce the risk that changes to our CoreDNS configuration break DNS resolution for clients.
To begin with, we add E2E DNS testing for 2 or 3 client libraries to establish a framework for testing DNS resolvers; the work of adding additional client libraries to this framework can be left for follow-up stories. Two common libraries are Go's resolver and glibc's resolver. A somewhat common library that is known to have quirks is musl libc's resolver, which uses a shorter timeout value than glibc's resolver and reportedly has issues with the EDNS0 protocol extension. It would also make sense to test Java or other popular languages or runtimes that have their own resolvers.
Additionally, as talked about in our DNS Issue Retro & Testing Coverage meeting on Feb 28th 2024, we also decided to add a test for testing a non-EDNS0 query for a larger than 512 byte record, as once was an issue in bug OCPBUGS-27397.
The ultimate goal is that the test will inform us when a change to OpenShift's DNS or networking has an effect that may impact end-user applications.
Requirement | Notes | isMvp? |
---|
CI - MUST be running successfully with test automation | This is a requirement for ALL features. | YES |
Release Technical Enablement | Provide necessary release enablement details and documents. | YES |
This Section:
This Section: What does the person writing code, testing, documenting need to know? What context can be provided to frame this feature.
Questions to be addressed:
During master nodes upgrade when nodes are getting drained there's currently no protection from two or more operands going down. If your component is required to be available during upgrade or other voluntary disruptions, please consider deploying PDB to protect your operands.
The effort is tracked in https://issues.redhat.com/browse/WRKLDS-293.
Example:
Acceptance Criteria:
1. Create PDB controller in console-operator for both console and downloads pods
2. Add e2e tests for PDB in single node and multi node cluster
Note: We should consider to backport this to 4.10
Goal
Add support for PDB (Pod Disruption Budget) to the console.
Requirements:
Designs:
When viewing the Installed Operators list set to 'All projects' and then selecting an operator that is available in 'All namespaces' (globally installed,) upon clicking the operator to view its details the user is taken into the details of that operator in installed namespace (project selector will switch to the install namespace.)
This can be disorienting then to look at the lists of custom resource instances and see them all blank, since the lists are showing instances only in the currently selected project (the install namespace) and not across all namespaces the operator is available in.
It is likely that making use of the new Operator resource will improve this experience (CONSOLE-2240,) though that may still be some releases away. it should be considered if it's worth a "short term" fix in the meantime.
Note: The informational alert was not implemented. It was decided that since "All namespaces" is displayed in the radio button, the alert was not needed.
Customers are asking for improvements to the upgrade experience (both over-the-air and disconnected). This is a feature tracking epics required to get that work done.
OCP/Telco Definition of Done
Epic Template descriptions and documentation.
<--- Cut-n-Paste the entire contents of this description into your new Epic --->
Goal
Improve the UX on the machine config pool page to reflect the new enhancements on the cluster settings that allows users to select the ability to update the control plane only.
Background
Currently in the console, users only have the ability to complete a full cluster upgrade. For many customers, upgrades take longer than what their maintenance window allows. Users need the ability to upgrade the control plane independently of the other worker nodes.
Ex. Upgrades of huge clusters may take too long so admins may do the control plane this weekend, worker-pool-A next weekend, worker-pool-B the weekend after, etc. It is all at a pool level, they will not be able to choose specific hosts.
Requirements
Design deliverables:
Goal
Add the ability to choose between a full cluster upgrade (which exists today) or control plane upgrade (which will pause all worker pools) in the console.
Background
Currently in the console, users only have the ability to complete a full cluster upgrade. For many customers, upgrades take longer than what their maintenance window allows. Users need the ability to upgrade the control plane independently of the other worker nodes.
Ex. Upgrades of huge clusters may take too long so admins may do the control plane this weekend, worker-pool-A next weekend, worker-pool-B the weekend after, etc. It is all at a pool level, they will not be able to choose specific hosts.
Requirements
Design deliverables:
Enable sharing ConfigMap and Secret across namespaces
Requirement | Notes | isMvp? |
---|---|---|
Secrets and ConfigMaps can get shared across namespaces | YES |
NA
NA
Consumption of RHEL entitlements has been a challenge on OCP 4 since it moved to a cluster-based entitlement model compared to the node-based (RHEL subscription manager) entitlement mode. In order to provide a sufficiently similar experience to OCP 3, the entitlement certificates that are made available on the cluster (OCPBU-93) should be shared across namespaces in order to prevent the need for cluster admin to copy these entitlements in each namespace which leads to additional operational challenges for updating and refreshing them.
Questions to be addressed:
* What educational or reference material (docs) is required to support this product feature? For users/admins? Other functions (security officers, etc)?
* Does this feature have doc impact?
* New Content, Updates to existing content, Release Note, or No Doc Impact
* If unsure and no Technical Writer is available, please contact Content Strategy.
* What concepts do customers need to understand to be successful in [action]?
* How do we expect customers will use the feature? For what purpose(s)?
* What reference material might a customer want/need to complete [action]?
* Is there source material that can be used as reference for the Technical Writer in writing the content? If yes, please link if available.
* What is the doc impact (New Content, Updates to existing content, or Release Note)?
OCP/Telco Definition of Done
Epic Template descriptions and documentation.
<--- Cut-n-Paste the entire contents of this description into your new Epic --->
As an OpenShift engineer,
I want to initialize a validating admission webhook for the shared resource CSI driver
So that I can eventually require readOnly: true to be set on all pods that use the Shared Resource CSI Driver
None.
None.
None.
This is a prerequisite for implementing the validating admission webhook.
We need to have ART build the container image downstream so that we can add the correct image references for the CVO.
If we reference images in the CVO manifests which do not have downstream counterparts, we break the downstream build for the payload.
CI is capable of producing multiple images for a GitHub repository. For example, github.com/openshift/oc produces 4-5 images with various capabilities.
We did similar work in BUILD-234 - some of these steps are not required.
See also:
Tasks:
As an OpenShift engineer
I want the shared resource CSI Driver webhook to be installed with the cluster storage operator
So that the webhook is deployed when the CSI driver is deployed
None - no new functional capabilities will be added
None - we can verify in CI that we are deploying the webhook correctly.
None - no new functional capabilities will be added
The scope of this story is to just deploy the "hello world" webhook with the Cluster Storage Operator.
Adding the live ValidatingWebhook configuration and service will be done in a separate story.
As a developer using SharedSecrets and ConfigMaps
I want to ensure all pods set readOnly; true on admission
So that I don't have pods stuck in the "Pending" state because of a bad volume mount
QE will need to verify the new Pod Admission behavior
Docs will need to ensure that readOnly: true is required and must be set to true.
None.
QE testing/verification of the feature - require readOnly to be true
Actions:
1. Create smoke test and submit to GitHub
2. Run script to integrate smoke test with Polarion
OCP/Telco Definition of Done
Feature Template descriptions and documentation.
<--- Cut-n-Paste the entire contents of this description into your new Feature --->
<--- Remove the descriptive text as appropriate --->
Problem
Requirement | Notes | isMvp? |
---|---|---|
CI - MUST be running successfully with test automation | This is a requirement for ALL features. | YES |
Release Technical Enablement | Provide necessary release enablement details and documents. | YES |
This Section:
This Section: What does the person writing code, testing, documenting need to know? What context can be provided to frame this feature.
Questions to be addressed:
Running the OPCT with the latest version (v0.1.0) on OCP 4.11.0, the openshift-tests is reporting an incorrect counter for the "total" field.
In the example below, after the 1127th test, the total follows the same counter of executed. I also would assume that the total is incorrect before that point as the test continues the execution increases both counters.
openshift-tests output format: [failed/executed/total]
started: (0/1126/1127) "[sig-storage] PersistentVolumes-expansion loopback local block volume should support online expansion on node [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel] [Suite:k8s]" passed: (38s) 2022-08-09T17:12:21 "[sig-storage] In-tree Volumes [Driver: nfs] [Testpattern: Dynamic PV (default fs)] provisioning should provision storage with mount options [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel] [Suite:k8s]" started: (0/1127/1127) "[sig-storage] In-tree Volumes [Driver: local][LocalVolumeType: tmpfs] [Testpattern: Generic Ephemeral-volume (block volmode) (late-binding)] ephemeral should support two pods which have the same volume definition [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel] [Suite:k8s]" passed: (6.6s) 2022-08-09T17:12:21 "[sig-storage] Downward API volume should provide container's memory request [NodeConformance] [Conformance] [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel/minimal] [Suite:k8s]" started: (0/1128/1128) "[sig-storage] In-tree Volumes [Driver: cinder] [Testpattern: Dynamic PV (immediate binding)] topology should fail to schedule a pod which has topologies that conflict with AllowedTopologies [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel] [Suite:k8s]" skip [k8s.io/kubernetes@v1.24.0/test/e2e/storage/framework/testsuite.go:116]: Driver local doesn't support GenericEphemeralVolume -- skipping Ginkgo exit error 3: exit with code 3 skipped: (400ms) 2022-08-09T17:12:21 "[sig-storage] In-tree Volumes [Driver: local][LocalVolumeType: tmpfs] [Testpattern: Generic Ephemeral-volume (block volmode) (late-binding)] ephemeral should support two pods which have the same volume definition [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel] [Suite:k8s]" started: (0/1129/1129) "[sig-storage] In-tree Volumes [Driver: emptydir] [Testpattern: Dynamic PV (default fs)] capacity provides storage capacity information [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel] [Suite:k8s]"
OPCT output format [executed/total (failed failures)]
Tue, 09 Aug 2022 14:12:13 -03> Global Status: running JOB_NAME | STATUS | RESULTS | PROGRESS | MESSAGE openshift-conformance-validated | running | | 1112/1127 (0 failures) | status=running openshift-kube-conformance | complete | | 352/352 (0 failures) | waiting for post-processor... Tue, 09 Aug 2022 14:12:23 -03> Global Status: running JOB_NAME | STATUS | RESULTS | PROGRESS | MESSAGE openshift-conformance-validated | running | | 1120/1127 (0 failures) | status=running openshift-kube-conformance | complete | | 352/352 (0 failures) | waiting for post-processor... Tue, 09 Aug 2022 14:12:33 -03> Global Status: running JOB_NAME | STATUS | RESULTS | PROGRESS | MESSAGE openshift-conformance-validated | running | | 1139/1139 (0 failures) | status=running openshift-kube-conformance | complete | | 352/352 (0 failures) | waiting for post-processor... Tue, 09 Aug 2022 14:12:43 -03> Global Status: running JOB_NAME | STATUS | RESULTS | PROGRESS | MESSAGE openshift-conformance-validated | running | | 1185/1185 (0 failures) | status=running openshift-kube-conformance | complete | | 352/352 (0 failures) | waiting for post-processor... Tue, 09 Aug 2022 14:12:53 -03> Global Status: running JOB_NAME | STATUS | RESULTS | PROGRESS | MESSAGE openshift-conformance-validated | running | | 1188/1188 (0 failures) | status=running openshift-kube-conformance | complete | | 352/352 (0 failures) | waiting for post-processor...
This section includes Jira cards that are linked to an Epic, but the Epic itself is not linked to any Feature. These epics were completed when this image was assembled
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/AUTH-2 revealed that, in prinicipal, Pod Security Admission is possible to integrate into OpenShift while retaining SCC functionality.
This epic is about the concrete steps to enable Pod Security Admission by default in OpenShift
Enhancement - https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/pull/1010
ingress-operator must comply to pod security. The current audit warning is:
{ "objectRef": "openshift-ingress-operator/deployments/ingress-operator", "pod-security.kubernetes.io/audit-violations": "would violate PodSecurity \"restricted:latest\": allowPrivilegeEscalation != false (containers \"ingress-operator\", \"kube-rbac-proxy\" must set securityContext.allowPrivilegeEscalation=false), unrestricted capabilities (containers \"ingress-operator\", \"kube-rbac-proxy\" must set securityContext.capabilities.drop=[\"ALL\"]), runAsNonRoot != true (pod or containers \"ingress-operator\", \"kube-rbac-proxy\" must set securityContext.run AsNonRoot=true), seccompProfile (pod or containers \"ingress-operator\", \"kube-rbac-proxy\" must set securityContext.seccompProfile.type to \"RuntimeDefault\" or \"Localhost\")" }
dns-operator must comply to restricted pod security level. The current audit warning is:
{ "objectRef": "openshift-dns-operator/deployments/dns-operator", "pod-security.kubernetes.io/audit-violations": "would violate PodSecurity \"restricted:latest\": allowPrivilegeEscalation != false (containers \"dns-operator\", \"kube-rbac-proxy\" must set securityContext.allowPrivilegeEscalation=false), unre stricted capabilities (containers \"dns-operator\", \"kube-rbac-proxy\" must set securityContext.capabilities.drop=[\"ALL\"]), runAsNonRoot != true (pod or containers \"dns-operator\", \"kube-rbac-proxy\" must set securityContext.runAsNonRoot=tr ue), seccompProfile (pod or containers \"dns-operator\", \"kube-rbac-proxy\" must set securityContext.seccompProfile.type to \"RuntimeDefault\" or \"Localhost\")" }HyperShift provisions OpenShift clusters with externally managed control-planes. It follows a slightly different process for provisioning clusters. For example, HyperShift uses cluster API as a backend and moves all the machine management bits to the management cluster.
showing machine management/cluster auto-scaling tabs in the console is likely to confuse users and cause unnecessary side effects.
See Design Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1k76JtRRHBdCCEjHPqKcYvbNVsuaGmRhWDLESWIm0mbo/edit#
It's based on the SERVER_FLAG controlPlaneTopology being set to External is really the driving factor here; this can be done in one of two ways:
To test work related to cluster upgrade process, use a 4.10.3 cluster set on the candidate-4.10 upgrade channel using 4.11 frontend code.
If the Infrastructure.Status.ControlPlaneTopology is set to 'External', the console-operator will pass this information via the console-config.yaml co the console. Console pod will get re-deployed and will store the topology mode information as a SERVER_FLAG. Based on that value we need surface a message that the control plane is externally managed and add following changes:
In general, anything that changes a cluster version should be read only.
Check section 02 for more info: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1k76JtRRHBdCCEjHPqKcYvbNVsuaGmRhWDLESWIm0mbo/edit#
Based on Cesar's comment we should be removing the `Control Plane` section, if the infrastructure.status.controlplanetopology being "External".
If the Infrastructure.Status.ControlPlaneTopology is set to 'External', the console-operator will pass this information via the console-config.yaml to the console. Console pod will get re-deployed and will store the topology mode information as a SERVER_FLAG. Based on that value we need to suspend kubeadmin notifier, from the global notifications, since it contain link for updating the cluster OAuth configuration (see attachment).
If the Infrastructure.Status.ControlPlaneTopology is set to 'External', the console-operator will pass this information via the console-config.yaml to the console. Console pod will get re-deployed and will store the topology mode information as a SERVER_FLAG. Based on that value we need to suspend these notifications:
For these we will need to check `ControlPlaneTopology`, if it's set to 'External' and also check if the user can edit cluster version(either by creating a hook or an RBAC call, eg. `canEditClusterVersion`)
Check section 05 for more info: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1k76JtRRHBdCCEjHPqKcYvbNVsuaGmRhWDLESWIm0mbo/edit#
If the Infrastructure.Status.ControlPlaneTopology is set to 'External', the console-operator will pass this information via the console-config.yaml co the console. Console pod will get re-deployed and will store the topology mode information as a SERVER_FLAG. Based on that value we need to remove the ability to “Add identity providers” under “Set up your Cluster”. In addition to the getting started card, we should remove the ability to update a cluster on the details card when applicable (anything that changes a cluster version should be read only).
Summary of changes to the overview page:
Check section 03 for more info: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1k76JtRRHBdCCEjHPqKcYvbNVsuaGmRhWDLESWIm0mbo/edit#
PatternFly Dark Theme Handbook: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1mRYEfUoOjTsSt7hiqjbeplqhfo3_rVDO0QqMj2p67pw/edit
Admin Console -> Workloads & Pods
Dev Console -> Gotcha pages: Observe Dashboard and Metrics, Add, Pipelines: builder, list, log, and run
As a developer, I want to be able to scope the changes needed to enable dark mode for the admin console. As such, I need to investigate how much of the console will display dark mode using PF variables and also define a list of gotcha pages/components which will need special casing above and beyond PF variable settings.
Acceptance criteria:
As a developer, I want to be able to fix remaining issues from the spreadsheet of issues generated after the initial pass and spike of adding dark theme to the console.. As such, I need to make sure to either complete all remaining issues for the spreadsheet, or, create a bug or future story for any remaining issues in these two documents.
Acceptance criteria:
An epic we can duplicate for each release to ensure we have a place to catch things we ought to be doing regularly but can tend to fall by the wayside.
The Cluster Dashboard Details Card Protractor integration test was failing at high rate, and despite multiple attempts to fix, was never fully resolved, so it was disabled as a way to fix https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2068594. Migrating this entire file to Cypress should give us better debugging capability, which is what was done to fix a similarly problematic project dashboard Protractor test.
Currently, enabled plugins can fail to load for a variety of reasons. For instance, plugins don't load if the plugin name in the manifest doesn't match the ConsolePlugin name or the plugin has an invalid codeRef. There is no indication in the UI that something has gone wrong. We should explore ways to report this problem in the UI to cluster admins. Depending on the nature of the issue, an admin might be able to resolve the issue or at least report a bug against the plugin.
The message about failing could appear in the notification drawer and/or console plugins tab on the operator config. We could also explore creating an alert if a plugin is failing.
AC:
Currently, you need to navigate to
Cluster Settings ->
Global configuration ->
Console (operator) config ->
Console plugins
to see and managed plugins. This takes a lot of clicks and is not discoverable. We should look at surfacing plugin details where they're easier to find – perhaps on the Cluster Settings page – or at least provide a more convenient link somewhere in the UI.
AC: Add the Dynamic Plugins section to the Status Card in the overview that will contain:
In the 4.11 release, a console.openshift.io/default-i18next-namespace annotation is being introduced. The annotation indicates whether the ConsolePlugin contains localization resources. If the annotation is set to "true", the localization resources from the i18n namespace named after the dynamic plugin (e.g. plugin__kubevirt), are loaded. If the annotation is set to any other value or is missing on the ConsolePlugin resource, localization resources are not loaded.
In case these resources are not present in the dynamic plugin, the initial console load will be slowed down. For more info check BZ#2015654
AC:
Follow up of https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CONSOLE-3159
We need to provide a base for running integration tests using the dynamic plugins. The tests should initially
Once the basic framework is in place, we can update the demo plugin and add new integration tests when we add new extension points.
https://github.com/openshift/console/tree/master/frontend/dynamic-demo-plugin
https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/blob/master/enhancements/console/dynamic-plugins.md
https://github.com/openshift/console/tree/master/frontend/packages/console-plugin-sdk
We have a Timestamp component for consistent display of dates and times that we should expose through the SDK. We might also consider a hook that formats dates and times for places were you don't want or cant use the component, eg. times on a chart.
This will become important when we add a user preference for dates so that plugins show consistent dates and times as console. If I set my user preference to UTC dates, console should show UTC dates everywhere.
AC:
Goal
Background
RFE: for 4.10, Cincinnati and the cluster-version operator are adding conditional updates (a.k.a. targeted edge blocking): https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OTA-267
High-level plans in https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/blob/master/enhancements/update/targeted-update-edge-blocking.md#update-client-support-for-the-enhanced-schema
Example of what the oc adm upgrade UX will be in https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/blob/master/enhancements/update/targeted-update-edge-blocking.md#cluster-administrator.
The oc implementation landed via https://github.com/openshift/oc/pull/961.
Design
See design doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Nja4whdsI5dKmQNS_rXyN8IGtRXDJ8gXuU_eSxBLMIY/edit#
See marvel: https://marvelapp.com/prototype/h3ehaa4/screen/86077932
Update the cluster settings page to inform the user when the latest available update is supported but not recommended. Add an informational popover to the latest version in update path visualization.
The "Update Version" modal on the cluster settings page should be updated to give users information about recommended, not recommended, and blocked update versions.
Story: As an administrator I want to rely on a default configuration that spreads image registry pods across topology zones so that I don't suffer from a long recovery time (>6 mins) in case of a complete zone failure if all pods are impacted.
Background: The image registry currently uses affinity/anti-affinity rules to spread registry pods across different hosts. However this might cause situations in which all pods end up on hosts of a single zone, leading to a long recovery time of the registry if that zone is lost entirely. However due to problems in the past with the preferred setting of anti-affinity rule adherence the configuration was forced instead with required and the rules became constraints. With zones as constraints the internal registry would not have deployed anymore in environments with a single zone, e.g. internal CI environment. Pod topology constraints is a new API that is supported in OCP which can also relax constraints in case they cannot be satisfied. Details here: https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.7/nodes/scheduling/nodes-scheduler-pod-topology-spread-constraints.html
Acceptance criteria:
Open Questions:
As an OpenShift administrator
I want to provide the registry operator with a custom certificate authority for S3 storage
so that I can use a third-party S3 storage provider.
Remove Jenkins from the OCP Payload.
See epic linking - need alternative non payload image available to provide relatively seamless migration
Also, the EP for this is approved and merged at https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/blob/master/enhancements/builds/remove-jenkins-payload.md
PARTIAL ANSWER ^^: confirmed with Ben Parees in https://coreos.slack.com/archives/C014MHHKUSF/p1646683621293839 that EP merging is currently sufficient OCP "technical leadership" approval.
assuming none
As maintainers of the OpenShift jenkins component, we need run Jenkins CI for PR testing against openshift/jenkins, openshift/jenkins-sync-plugin, openshift/jenkins-client-plugin, openshift/jenkins-openshift-login-plugin, using images built in the CI pipeline but not injected into CI test clusters via sample operator overriding the jenkins sample imagestream with the jenkins payload image.
As maintainers of the OpenShift Jenkins component, we need Jenkins periodics for the client and sync plugins to run against the latest non payload, CPaas image, promoted to CI's image locations on quay.io, for the current release in development.
As maintainers of the OpenShift Jenkins component, we need Jenkins related tests outside of very basic Jenkins Pipieline Strategy Build Config verification, removed from openshift-tests in OpenShift Origin, using a non-payload, CPaas image pertinent to the branch in question.
High Level, we ideally want to vet the new CPaas image via CI and periodics BEFORE we start changing the samples operator so that it does not manipulate the jenkins imagestream (our tests will override the samples operator override)
NONE ... QE should wait until JNKS-254
NONE
NONE
Dependencies identified
Blockers noted and expected delivery timelines set
Design is implementable
Acceptance criteria agreed upon
Story estimated
Possible staging
1) before CPaas is available, we can validate images generated by PRs to openshift/jenkins, openshift/jenkins-sync-plugin, openshift/jenkins-client-plugin by taking the image built by the image (where the info needed to get the right image from the CI registry is in the IMAGE_FORMAT env var) and then doing an `oc tag --source=docker <PR image ref> openshift/jenkins:2` to replace the use of the payload image in the jenkins imagestream in the openshift namespace with the PRs image
2) insert 1) in https://github.com/openshift/release/blob/master/ci-operator/step-registry/jenkins/sync-plugin/e2e/jenkins-sync-plugin-e2e-commands.sh and https://github.com/openshift/release/blob/master/ci-operator/step-registry/jenkins/client-plugin/tests/jenkins-client-plugin-tests-commands.sh where you test for IMAGE_FORMAT being set
3) or instead of 2) you update the Makefiles for the plugins to call a script that does the same sort of thing, see what is in IMAGE_FORMAT, and if it has something, do the `oc tag`
https://github.com/openshift/release/pull/26979 is a prototype of how to stick the image built from a PR and conceivably the periodics to get the image built from it and tag it into the jenkins imagestream in the openshift namespace in the test cluster
After installing or upgrading to the latest OCP version, the existing OpenShift route to the prometheus-k8s service is updated to be a path-based route to '/api/v1'.
DoD:
Following up on https://issues.redhat.com/browse/MON-1320, we added three new CLI flags to Prometheus to apply different limits on the samples' labels. These new flags are available starting from Prometheus v2.27.0, which will most likely be shipped in OpenShift 4.9.
The limits that we want to look into for OCP are the following ones:
# Per-scrape limit on number of labels that will be accepted for a sample. If # more than this number of labels are present post metric-relabeling, the # entire scrape will be treated as failed. 0 means no limit. [ label_limit: <int> | default = 0 ] # Per-scrape limit on length of labels name that will be accepted for a sample. # If a label name is longer than this number post metric-relabeling, the entire # scrape will be treated as failed. 0 means no limit. [ label_name_length_limit: <int> | default = 0 ] # Per-scrape limit on length of labels value that will be accepted for a sample. # If a label value is longer than this number post metric-relabeling, the # entire scrape will be treated as failed. 0 means no limit. [ label_value_length_limit: <int> | default = 0 ]
We could benefit from them by setting relatively high values that could only induce unbound cardinality and thus reject the targets completely if they happened to breach our constrainst.
DoD:
When users configure CMO to interact with systems outside of an OpenShift cluster, we want to provide an easy way to add the cluster ID to the data send.
Technically this can be achieved today, by adding an identifying label to the remote_write configuration for a given cluster. The operator adding the remote_write integration needs to take care that the label is unique over the managed fleet of clusters. This however adds management complexity. Any given cluster already has a pseudo-unique datum, that can be used for this purpose.
Expose a flag in the CMO configuration, that is false by default (keeps backward compatibility) and when set to true will add the _id label to a remote_write configuration. More specifically it will be added to the top of a remote_write relabel_config list via the replace action. This will add the label as expect, but additionally a user could alter this label in a later relabel config to suit any specific requirements (say rename the label or add additional information to the value).
The location of this flag is the remote_write Spec, so this can be set for individual remote_write configurations.
Add an optional boolean flag to CMOs definition of RemoteWriteSpec that if true adds an entry in the specs WriteRelabelConfigs list.
I went with adding the relabel config to all user-supplied remote_write configurations. This path has no risk for backwards compatibility (unless users use the {}tmp_openshift_cluster_id{} label, seems unlikely) and reduces overall complexity, as well as documentation complexity.
The entry should look like what is already added to the telemetry remote write config and it should be added as the first entry in the list, before any user supplied relabel configs.
We currently use a sample app to e2e test remote write in CMO.
In order to test the addition of the cluster_id relabel config, we need to confirm that the metrics send actually have the expected label.
For this test we should use Prometheus as the remote_write target. This allows us to query the metrics send via remote write and confirm they have the expected label.
The potential target ServiceMonitors are:
As a user, I want to understand which service bindings connected a service to a component successfully or not. Currently it's really difficult to understand and needs inspection into each ServiceBinding resource (yaml).
See also https://docs.google.com/document/d/1OzE74z2RGO5LPjtDoJeUgYBQXBSVmD5tCC7xfJotE00/edit
As a user, I want the topology view to be less cluttered as I doom out showing only information that I can discern and still be able to get a feel for the status of my project.
This epic is mainly focused on the 4.10 Release QE activities
1. Identify the scenarios for automation
2. Segregate the test Scenarios into smoke, Regression and other user stories
a. Update the https://docs.jboss.org/display/ODC/Automation+Status+Report
3. Align with layered operator teams for updating scripts
3. Work closely with dev team for epic automation
4. Create the automation scripts using cypress
5. Implement CI for nightly builds
6. Execute scripts on sprint basis
To the track the QE progress at one place in 4.10 Release Confluence page
Acceptance criteria:
This epic covers a number of customer requests(RFEs) as well as increases usability.
Customer satisfaction as well as improved usability.
None
As a user, I want to use a form to create Deployments
Edit deployment form ODC-5007
As a user, I should be able to switch between the form and yaml editor while creating the ProjectHelmChartRepository CR.
Form component https://github.com/openshift/console/pull/11227
Currently we are only able to get limited telemetry from the Dev Sandbox, but not from any of our managed clusters or on prem clusters.
In order to improve properly analyze usage and the user experience, we need to be able to gather as much data as possible.
// JS type
telemetry?: Record<string, string>
./bin/bridge --telemetry SEGMENT_API_KEY=a-key-123-xzy ./bin/bridge --telemetry CONSOLE_LOG=debug
Goal:
Enhance oc adm release new (and related verbs info, extract, mirror) with heterogeneous architecture support
tl;dr
oc adm release new (and related verbs info, extract, mirror) would be enhanced to optionally allow the creation of manifest list release payloads. The manifest list flow would be triggered whenever the CVO image in an imagestream was a manifest list. If the CVO image is a standard manifest, the generated release payload will also be a manifest. If the CVO image is a manifest list, the generated release payload would be a manifest list (containing a manifest for each arch possessed by the CVO manifest list).
In either case, oc adm release new would permit non-CVO component images to be manifest or manifest lists and pass them through directly to the resultant release manifest(s).
If a manifest list release payload is generated, each architecture specific release payload manifest will reference the same pullspecs provided in the input imagestream.
More details in Option 1 of https://docs.google.com/document/d/1BOlPrmPhuGboZbLZWApXszxuJ1eish92NlOeb03XEdE/edit#heading=h.eldc1ppinjjh
This section includes Jira cards that are linked to an Epic, but the Epic itself is not linked to any Feature. These epics were not completed when this image was assembled
I asked Zvonko Kaiser and he seemed open to it. I need to confirm with Shiva Merla
Rename Provider to Infrastructure Provider
Add GPU Provider
https://miro.com/app/board/uXjVOeUB2B4=/?moveToWidget=3458764514332229879&cot=14
OCP/Telco Definition of Done
Epic Template descriptions and documentation.
<--- Cut-n-Paste the entire contents of this description into your new Epic --->
As a developer building container images on OpenShift
I want to specify that my build should run without elevated privileges
So that builds do not run as root from the host's perspective with elevated privileges
No QE required for Dev Preview. OpenShift regression testing will verify that existing behavior is not impacted.
We will need to document how to enable this feature, with sufficient warnings regarding Dev Preview.
This likely warrants an OpenShift blog post, potentially?
This section includes Jira cards that are not linked to either an Epic or a Feature. These tickets were completed when this image was assembled
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-4489. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-4168. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:
Prometheus continuously restarts due to slow WAL replay
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
openshift - 4.11.13
How reproducible:
Steps to Reproduce:
1. 2. 3.
Actual results:
Expected results:
Additional info:
Description of problem:
This issue exists to drive the backport process of https://github.com/openshift/api/pull/1313
According to the Kubernetes documentation, starting from Kubernetes 1.22, the service-account-issuer flag can be specified multiple times. The first value is then used to generate new tokens and other values are accepted. Using this field can prevent cluster disruptions and allows for smoother reconfiguration of this field.
The status field will allow us to keep track of "used" service account issuers and also expire/prune them.
this is a replacement for: #1309
xref: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/AUTH-309
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
Steps to Reproduce:
1. 2. 3.
Actual results:
Expected results:
Additional info:
Description of problem:
This is a clone of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2074299 for backporting purposes.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
Steps to Reproduce:
1. 2. 3.
Actual results:
Expected results:
Additional info:
This bug is a backport clone of [Bugzilla Bug 2073220](https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2073220). The following is the description of the original bug:
—
Description of problem:
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 4.*
How reproducible: always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Set audit profile to WriteRequestBodies
2. Wait for api server rollout to complete
3. tail -f /var/log/kube-apiserver/audit.log | grep routes/status
Actual results:
Write events to routes/status are recorded at the RequestResponse level, which often includes keys and certificates.
Expected results:
Events involving routes should always be recorded at the Metadata level, per the documentation at https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.10/security/audit-log-policy-config.html#about-audit-log-profiles_audit-log-policy-config
Additional info:
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-1522. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:
Normal user cannot open the debug container from the pods(crashLoopbackoff) they created, And would be got error message: pods "<pod name>" is forbidden: cannot set blockOwnerDeletion if an ownerReference refers to a resource you can't set finalizers on: , <nil>
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107, 4.11.z, 4.10.z
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Login OCP as a normal user eg: flexy-htpasswd-provider 2. Create a project, go to Developer prespective -> +Add page 3. Click "Import from Git", and provide below data to get a Pods with CrashLoopBackOff state Git Repo URL: https://github.com/sclorg/nodejs-ex.git Name: nodejs-ex-git Run command: star a wktw 4. Navigate to /k8s/ns/<project name>/pods page, find the pod with CrashLoopBackOff status, and go to it details page -> Logs Tab 5. Click the link of "Debug container" 6. Check if the Debug container can be opened
Actual results:
6. Error message would be shown on page, user cannot open debug container via UI pods "nodejs-ex-git-6dd986d8bd-9h2wj-debug-tkqk2" is forbidden: cannot set blockOwnerDeletion if an ownerReference refers to a resource you can't set finalizers on: , <nil>
Expected results:
6. Normal user could use debug container without any error message
Additional info:
The debug container could be created for the normal user successfully via CommandLine $ oc debug <crashloopbackoff pod name> -n <project name>
Description of problem:
Availability Set will be created when vmSize is invalid in a region which has zones, but Availability Set should only be created in a region which don’t have zones.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-10-07-174524 4.10.0-0.nightly-2022-10-07-205844
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.Set up a cluster in a region which has zones. liuhuali@Lius-MacBook-Pro huali-test % oc get machine NAME PHASE TYPE REGION ZONE AGE huliu-az410-99qcm-master-0 Running Standard_D8s_v3 eastus 2 34m huliu-az410-99qcm-master-1 Running Standard_D8s_v3 eastus 3 34m huliu-az410-99qcm-master-2 Running Standard_D8s_v3 eastus 1 34m huliu-az410-99qcm-worker-eastus1-xld58 Running Standard_D4s_v3 eastus 1 27m huliu-az410-99qcm-worker-eastus2-chzg8 Running Standard_D4s_v3 eastus 2 27m huliu-az410-99qcm-worker-eastus3-7g2mw Running Standard_D4s_v3 eastus 3 27m 2.Create a machineset with invalid vmSize liuhuali@Lius-MacBook-Pro huali-test % oc create -f ms4.yaml machineset.machine.openshift.io/huliu-az410-99qcm-1 created liuhuali@Lius-MacBook-Pro huali-test % oc get machine NAME PHASE TYPE REGION ZONE AGE huliu-az410-99qcm-1-cfw6w Failed 8s huliu-az410-99qcm-master-0 Running Standard_D8s_v3 eastus 2 35m huliu-az410-99qcm-master-1 Running Standard_D8s_v3 eastus 3 35m huliu-az410-99qcm-master-2 Running Standard_D8s_v3 eastus 1 35m huliu-az410-99qcm-worker-eastus1-xld58 Running Standard_D4s_v3 eastus 1 28m huliu-az410-99qcm-worker-eastus2-chzg8 Running Standard_D4s_v3 eastus 2 28m huliu-az410-99qcm-worker-eastus3-7g2mw Running Standard_D4s_v3 eastus 3 28m liuhuali@Lius-MacBook-Pro huali-test % oc get machine huliu-az410-99qcm-1-cfw6w -o yaml apiVersion: machine.openshift.io/v1beta1 kind: Machine metadata: annotations: machine.openshift.io/instance-state: Unknown creationTimestamp: "2022-10-08T07:42:28Z" finalizers: - machine.machine.openshift.io generateName: huliu-az410-99qcm-1- generation: 2 labels: machine.openshift.io/cluster-api-cluster: huliu-az410-99qcm machine.openshift.io/cluster-api-machine-role: worker machine.openshift.io/cluster-api-machine-type: worker machine.openshift.io/cluster-api-machineset: huliu-az410-99qcm-1 name: huliu-az410-99qcm-1-cfw6w namespace: openshift-machine-api ownerReferences: - apiVersion: machine.openshift.io/v1beta1 blockOwnerDeletion: true controller: true kind: MachineSet name: huliu-az410-99qcm-1 uid: bf8f7518-1fa9-4704-bdd7-6d0fde54e38e resourceVersion: "31287" uid: 303cf672-a2fa-44f3-8793-59801bb78902 spec: lifecycleHooks: {} metadata: {} providerSpec: value: apiVersion: machine.openshift.io/v1beta1 credentialsSecret: name: azure-cloud-credentials namespace: openshift-machine-api image: offer: "" publisher: "" resourceID: /resourceGroups/huliu-az410-99qcm-rg/providers/Microsoft.Compute/images/huliu-az410-99qcm sku: "" version: "" kind: AzureMachineProviderSpec location: eastus managedIdentity: huliu-az410-99qcm-identity metadata: creationTimestamp: null name: huliu-az410-99qcm networkResourceGroup: huliu-az410-99qcm-rg osDisk: diskSettings: {} diskSizeGB: 128 managedDisk: storageAccountType: Premium_LRS osType: Linux publicIP: false publicLoadBalancer: huliu-az410-99qcm resourceGroup: huliu-az410-99qcm-rg spotVMOptions: {} subnet: huliu-az410-99qcm-worker-subnet userDataSecret: name: worker-user-data vmSize: invalidStandard_D4s_v3 vnet: huliu-az410-99qcm-vnet zone: "3" status: conditions: - lastTransitionTime: "2022-10-08T07:42:28Z" status: "True" type: Drainable - lastTransitionTime: "2022-10-08T07:42:28Z" message: Instance has not been created reason: InstanceNotCreated severity: Warning status: "False" type: InstanceExists - lastTransitionTime: "2022-10-08T07:42:28Z" status: "True" type: Terminable errorMessage: 'failed to reconcile machine "huliu-az410-99qcm-1-cfw6w": failed to create vm huliu-az410-99qcm-1-cfw6w: failure sending request for machine huliu-az410-99qcm-1-cfw6w: cannot create vm: compute.VirtualMachinesClient#CreateOrUpdate: Failure sending request: StatusCode=0 -- Original Error: Code="BadRequest" Message="Virtual Machine cannot be created because both Availability Zone and Availability Set were specified. Deploying an Availability Set to an Availability Zone isn’t supported."' errorReason: InvalidConfiguration lastUpdated: "2022-10-08T07:42:35Z" phase: Failed providerStatus: conditions: - lastProbeTime: "2022-10-08T07:42:35Z" lastTransitionTime: "2022-10-08T07:42:35Z" message: 'failed to create vm huliu-az410-99qcm-1-cfw6w: failure sending request for machine huliu-az410-99qcm-1-cfw6w: cannot create vm: compute.VirtualMachinesClient#CreateOrUpdate: Failure sending request: StatusCode=0 -- Original Error: Code="BadRequest" Message="Virtual Machine cannot be created because both Availability Zone and Availability Set were specified. Deploying an Availability Set to an Availability Zone isn’t supported."' reason: MachineCreationFailed status: "True" type: MachineCreated metadata: {}
Actual results:
Created Availability Set for it.
Expected results:
Should not create Availability Set, as the region has zones.
Additional info:
If provided correct vmSize, the machine get Running and will not create Availability Set for it. Not sure why it will create Availability Set for it when vmSize is invalid. The issue can be reproduced both on 4.11 and 4.10 version, as Availability Set is introduced in 4.10. On 4.12, there is bug https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-1871, will also check this on 4.12 when this bug get verified.
Description of problem:
This bugs purpose is to enable a feature backport of https://issues.redhat.com/browse/MON-1949.
Description of problem:
Provisioning interface on master node not getting ipv4 dhcp ip address from bootstrap dhcp server on OCP 4.10.16 IPI BareMetal install.
Customer is performing an OCP 4.10.16 IPI BareMetal install and bootstrap node provisions just fine, but when master nodes are booted for provisioning, they are not getting an ipv4 address via dhcp. As such, the install is not moving forward at this point.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
OCP 4.10.16
How reproducible:
Perform OCP 4.10.16 IPI BareMetal install.
Actual results:
provisioning interface comes up (as evidenced by ipv6 address) but is not getting an ipv4 address via dhcp. OCP install / provisioning fails at this point.
Expected results:
provisioning interface successfully received an ipv4 ip address and successfully provisioned master nodes (and subsequently worker nodes as well.)
Additional info:
As a troubleshooting measure, manually adding an ipv4 ip address did allow the coreos image on the bootstrap node to be reached via curl.
Further, the kernel boot line for the first master node was updated for a static ip addresss assignment for further confirmation that the master node would successfully image this way which further confirming that the issue is the provisioning interface not receiving an ipv4 ip address from the dhcp server.
This bug is a backport clone of [Bugzilla Bug 2034883](https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2034883). The following is the description of the original bug:
—
Description of problem:
Situation (starting point):
Problem:
Version-Release number of MCO (Machine Config Operator) (if applicable):
4.7.21
Platform (AWS, VSphere, Metal, etc.): (not relevant)
Are you certain that the root cause of the issue being reported is the MCO (Machine Config Operator)?
(Y/N/Not sure): Y
How reproducible:
Always if the said conditions are met.
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Have some nodes not ready
2. Force a change that requires machine-config-daemon daemonset rollout (I think that changing proxy settings would work for this)
3. Wait until a new kube-apiserver-to-kubelet-client-ca is rolled out by kube-apiserver-operator
Actual results:
New kube-apiserver-to-kubelet-client-ca not forwarded to controllerconfig, kube-apiserver-to-kubelet-client-ca not deployed on nodes
Expected results:
kube-apiserver-to-kubelet-client-ca forwarded to controllerconfig, kube-apiserver-to-kubelet-client-ca deployed to nodes.
Additional info:
In comments
This is a clone of OCPBUGSM-47085
Version:
$ openshift-install version
4.11.0-rc2
Platform:
Nutanix
On `openshift-installer create manifests` stage a connection to Prism is made (see https://github.com/openshift/installer/blob/master/pkg/asset/installconfig/nutanix/validation.go#L15-L36=)
This make generating manifests separately impossible, which breaks Assisted Installer flow. Instead of storing sensitive user information, Assisted Installer sets fake details in install-config.yaml and asks user to update these after installation has completed.
With validation happening on `openshift-install create manifests` phase installation process can't start with invalid credentials.
Please move this validation to ValidateForProvisioning, similar to vSphere
Description of problem:
When adding new nodes to the existing cluster, the newly allocated node-subnet can be overlapped with the existing node.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
openshift 4.10.30
How reproducible:
It's quite hard to reproduce but there is a possibility it can happen any time.
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Create a OVN dual-stack cluster 2. add nodes to the existing cluster 3. check the allocated node subnet
Actual results:
Some newly added nodes have the same node-subnet and ovn-k8s-mp0 IP as some existing nodes.
Expected results:
Should have duplicated node-subnet and ovn-k8s-mp0 IP
Additional info:
Additional info can be found at the case 03329155 and the must-gather attached(comment #1) % omg logs ovnkube-master-v8crc -n openshift-ovn-kubernetes -c ovnkube-master | grep '2022-09-30T06:42:50.857' 2022-09-30T06:42:50.857031565Z W0930 06:42:50.857020 1 master.go:1422] Did not find any logical switches with other-config 2022-09-30T06:42:50.857112441Z I0930 06:42:50.857099 1 master.go:1003] Allocated Subnets [10.131.0.0/23 fd02:0:0:4::/64] on Node worker01.ss1.samsung.local 2022-09-30T06:42:50.857122455Z I0930 06:42:50.857105 1 master.go:1003] Allocated Subnets [10.129.4.0/23 fd02:0:0:a::/64] on Node oam04.ss1.samsung.local 2022-09-30T06:42:50.857130289Z I0930 06:42:50.857122 1 kube.go:99] Setting annotations map[k8s.ovn.org/node-subnets:{"default":["10.131.0.0/23","fd02:0:0:4::/64"]}] on node worker01.ss1.samsung.local 2022-09-30T06:42:50.857140773Z I0930 06:42:50.857132 1 kube.go:99] Setting annotations map[k8s.ovn.org/node-subnets:{"default":["10.129.4.0/23","fd02:0:0:a::/64"]}] on node oam04.ss1.samsung.local 2022-09-30T06:42:50.857166726Z I0930 06:42:50.857156 1 master.go:1003] Allocated Subnets [10.128.2.0/23 fd02:0:0:5::/64] on Node oam01.ss1.samsung.local 2022-09-30T06:42:50.857176132Z I0930 06:42:50.857157 1 master.go:1003] Allocated Subnets [10.131.0.0/23 fd02:0:0:4::/64] on Node rhel01.ss1.samsung.local 2022-09-30T06:42:50.857176132Z I0930 06:42:50.857167 1 kube.go:99] Setting annotations map[k8s.ovn.org/node-subnets:{"default":["10.128.2.0/23","fd02:0:0:5::/64"]}] on node oam01.ss1.samsung.local 2022-09-30T06:42:50.857185257Z I0930 06:42:50.857157 1 master.go:1003] Allocated Subnets [10.128.6.0/23 fd02:0:0:d::/64] on Node call03.ss1.samsung.local 2022-09-30T06:42:50.857192996Z I0930 06:42:50.857183 1 kube.go:99] Setting annotations map[k8s.ovn.org/node-subnets:{"default":["10.131.0.0/23","fd02:0:0:4::/64"]}] on node rhel01.ss1.samsung.local 2022-09-30T06:42:50.857200017Z I0930 06:42:50.857190 1 kube.go:99] Setting annotations map[k8s.ovn.org/node-subnets:{"default":["10.128.6.0/23","fd02:0:0:d::/64"]}] on node call03.ss1.samsung.local 2022-09-30T06:42:50.857282717Z I0930 06:42:50.857258 1 master.go:1003] Allocated Subnets [10.130.2.0/23 fd02:0:0:7::/64] on Node call01.ss1.samsung.local 2022-09-30T06:42:50.857304886Z I0930 06:42:50.857293 1 kube.go:99] Setting annotations map[k8s.ovn.org/node-subnets:{"default":["10.130.2.0/23","fd02:0:0:7::/64"]}] on node call01.ss1.samsung.local 2022-09-30T06:42:50.857338896Z I0930 06:42:50.857314 1 master.go:1003] Allocated Subnets [10.128.4.0/23 fd02:0:0:9::/64] on Node f501.ss1.samsung.local 2022-09-30T06:42:50.857349485Z I0930 06:42:50.857329 1 master.go:1003] Allocated Subnets [10.131.2.0/23 fd02:0:0:8::/64] on Node call02.ss1.samsung.local 2022-09-30T06:42:50.857371344Z I0930 06:42:50.857354 1 kube.go:99] Setting annotations map[k8s.ovn.org/node-subnets:{"default":["10.128.4.0/23","fd02:0:0:9::/64"]}] on node f501.ss1.samsung.local 2022-09-30T06:42:50.857371344Z I0930 06:42:50.857361 1 kube.go:99] Setting annotations map[k8s.ovn.org/node-subnets:{"default":["10.131.2.0/23","fd02:0:0:8::/64"]}] on node call02.ss1.samsung.local
Description of problem:
Data race seen in unit tests: https://gcsweb-ci.apps.ci.l2s4.p1.openshiftapps.com/gcs/origin-ci-test/pr-logs/pull/openshift_ovn-kubernetes/1448/pull-ci-openshift-ovn-kubernetes-release-4.11-unit/1604898712423763968/artifacts/test/build-log.txt
Description of problem: Issue described in following issue: https://github.com/openshift/multus-admission-controller/issues/40
Fixed in: https://github.com/openshift/cluster-network-operator/pull/1515
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): OCP 4.10
Official Red Hat tracker. Issue has been merged already.
We're seeing a slight uptick in how long upgrades are taking[1][2]. We are not 100% sure of the cause, but it looks like it started with 4.11 rc.7. There's no obvious culprits in the diff[3].
Looking at some of the jobs, we are seeing the gaps between kube-scheduler being updated and then machine-api appear to take longer. Example job run[4] showing 10+ minutes waiting for it.
TRT had a debugging session, and we have two suggestions:
[1] https://search.ci.openshift.org/graph/metrics?metric=job%3Aduration%3Atotal%3Aseconds&job=periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.12-upgrade-from-stable-4.11-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade&job=periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.12-upgrade-from-stable-4.11-e2e-aws-sdn-upgrade&job=periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.12-upgrade-from-stable-4.11-e2e-azure-upgrade&job=periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.12-upgrade-from-stable-4.11-e2e-gcp-ovn-upgrade&job=periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.12-upgrade-from-stable-4.11-e2e-gcp-sdn-upgrade
[2] https://sippy.dptools.openshift.org/sippy-ng/tests/4.12/analysis?test=Cluster%20upgrade.%5Bsig-cluster-lifecycle%5D%20cluster%20upgrade%20should%20complete%20in%2075.00%20minutes
[3] https://amd64.ocp.releases.ci.openshift.org/releasestream/4-stable/release/4.11.0-rc.7
[4] https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gcs/origin-ci-test/logs/periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.12-e2e-azure-sdn-upgrade/1556865989923049472
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-6913. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-186. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:
When resizing the browser window, the PipelineRun task status bar would overlap the status text that says "Succeeded" in the screenshot.
Actual results:
Status text is overlapped by the task status bar
Expected results:
Status text breaks to a newline or gets shortened by "..."
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-78. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Copied from an upstream issue: https://github.com/operator-framework/operator-lifecycle-manager/issues/2830
What did you do?
When attempting to reinstall an operator that uses conversion webhooks by
The resulting InstallPlan enters a failed state with message similar to
error validating existing CRs against new CRD's schema for "devworkspaces.workspace.devfile.io": error listing resources in GroupVersionResource schema.GroupVersionResource{Group:"workspace.devfile.io", Version:"v1alpha1", Resource:"devworkspaces"}: conversion webhook for workspace.devfile.io/v1alpha2, Kind=DevWorkspace failed: Post "https://devworkspace-controller-manager-service.test-namespace.svc:443/convert?timeout=30s": service "devworkspace-controller-manager-service" not found
When the original CSVs are deleted, the operator's main deployment and service are removed, but CRDs are left in-cluster. However, since the service/CA bundle/deployment that serve the conversion webhook are removed, conversion webhooks are broken at that point. Eventually this impacts garbage collection on the cluster as well.
This can be reproduced by installing the DevWorkspace Operator from the Red Hat catalog. (I can provide yamls/upstream images that reproduce as well, if that's helpful). It may be necessary to create a DevWorkspace in the cluster before deletion, e.g. by oc apply -f https://raw.githubusercontent.com/devfile/devworkspace-operator/main/samples/plain.yaml
What did you expect to see?
Operator is able to be reinstalled without removing CRDs and all instances.
What did you see instead? Under which circumstances?
It's necessary to completely remove the operator including CRDs. For our operator (DevWorkspace), this also makes uninstall especially complicated as finalizers are used (so CRDs cannot be deleted if the controller is removed, and the controller cannot be restored by reinstalling)
Environment
operator-lifecycle-manager version: 4.10.24
Kubernetes version information: Kubernetes Version: v1.23.5+012e945 (OpenShift 4.10.24)
Kubernetes cluster kind: OpenShift
Description of problem:
The metal3 Pod of openshift-machine-api is in CrashLoopBackOff status.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.10.31
How reproducible:
Always reproduce in IPv6
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Preparing to configure ipi on the provisioning node - RHEL 8 ( haproxy, named, mirror registry, rhcos_cache_server ..) 2. configuring the install-config.yaml (attached) - provisioningNetwork: disabled - machine network: only IPv6 - disconnected installation 3. deploy the cluster
Actual results:
It is not possible to add worker nodes because metal3 does not start normally.
Expected results:
metal3 starts normally in IPv6 environment
Additional info:
1. attached must-gather https://drive.google.com/file/d/1GKxj3syROIMnURx_PYzOYhJdEuXBNXVW/view?usp=sharing 2. pod status [kni@prov ~]$ oc get pod NAME READY STATUS RESTARTS AGE cluster-autoscaler-operator-6656bfd7b9-bt4j8 2/2 Running 0 35h cluster-baremetal-operator-6bbdd6758-rmxgq 2/2 Running 0 35h machine-api-controllers-55fb545b56-kl5sj 7/7 Running 0 34h machine-api-operator-845b6cf855-q7gdd 2/2 Running 0 35h metal3-574876cfdb-98fmz 6/7 CrashLoopBackOff 179 (3m17s ago) 14h metal3-image-cache-5mq2w 1/1 Running 0 14h metal3-image-cache-nftpj 1/1 Running 0 14h metal3-image-cache-t7whh 1/1 Running 0 14h metal3-image-customization-68d4d6d99b-dbqgn 1/1 Running 0 15h [kni@prov ~]$ oc logs metal3-574876cfdb-98fmz -c metal3-httpd AH00526: Syntax error on line 8 of /etc/httpd/conf.d/vmedia.conf: The port number "2001:feed:101::102" is outside the appropriate range (i.e., 1..65535).
Description of problem:
Dummy bug that is needed to track backport of https://github.com/ovn-org/ovn-kubernetes/pull/2975/commits/816e30a1fbb5beb8b20fe3e96906285762dd8eb6 which is already merged in 4.12
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
Steps to Reproduce:
1. 2. 3.
Actual results:
Expected results:
Additional info:
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-683. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
{ 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-08-21-135326 }How reproducible:
Steps to Reproduce:
{See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2118563#c5, The following messages here are "normal" on startup, but it is very misleading with error statement, suggest suppress them or update them to some more clear context that we can know they are in normal process. E0818 02:18:53.709223 1 controller.go:165] error syncing 'br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-c955q': error retrieving the private IP configuration for node: br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-c955q, err: cannot parse valid nova server ID from providerId '', requeuing in node workqueue E0818 02:18:53.715530 1 controller.go:165] error syncing 'br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-sl9jn': error retrieving the private IP configuration for node: br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-sl9jn, err: cannot parse valid nova server ID from providerId '', requeuing in node workqueue E0818 02:18:53.735885 1 controller.go:165] error syncing 'br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-sl9jn': error retrieving the private IP configuration for node: br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-sl9jn, err: cannot parse valid nova server ID from providerId '', requeuing in node workqueue E0818 02:18:53.775984 1 controller.go:165] error syncing 'br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-sl9jn': error retrieving the private IP configuration for node: br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-sl9jn, err: cannot parse valid nova server ID from providerId '', requeuing in node workqueue E0818 02:18:53.790449 1 controller.go:165] error syncing 'br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-c955q': error retrieving the private IP configuration for node: br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-c955q, err: cannot parse valid nova server ID from providerId '', requeuing in node workqueue E0818 02:18:53.856911 1 controller.go:165] error syncing 'br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-sl9jn': error retrieving the private IP configuration for node: br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-sl9jn, err: cannot parse valid nova server ID from providerId '', requeuing in node workqueue E0818 02:18:53.950782 1 controller.go:165] error syncing 'br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-c955q': error retrieving the private IP configuration for node: br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-c955q, err: cannot parse valid nova server ID from providerId '', requeuing in node workqueue E0818 02:18:54.017583 1 controller.go:165] error syncing 'br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-sl9jn': error retrieving the private IP configuration for node: br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-sl9jn, err: cannot parse valid nova server ID from providerId '', requeuing in node workqueue E0818 02:18:54.271967 1 controller.go:165] error syncing 'br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-c955q': error retrieving the private IP configuration for node: br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-c955q, err: cannot parse valid nova server ID from providerId '', requeuing in node workqueue E0818 02:18:54.338944 1 controller.go:165] error syncing 'br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-sl9jn': error retrieving the private IP configuration for node: br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-sl9jn, err: cannot parse valid nova server ID from providerId '', requeuing in node workqueue E0818 02:18:54.916988 1 controller.go:165] error syncing 'br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-c955q': error retrieving the private IP configuration for node: br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-c955q, err: cannot parse valid nova server ID from providerId '', requeuing in node workqueue E0818 02:18:54.982211 1 controller.go:165] error syncing 'br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-sl9jn': error retrieving the private IP configuration for node: br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-sl9jn, err: cannot parse valid nova server ID from providerId '', requeuing in node workqueue}
Actual results:
Expected results:
Additional info:
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-7633. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-1125. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
(originally reported in BZ as https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1983200)
test:
[sig-etcd][Feature:DisasterRecovery][Disruptive] [Feature:EtcdRecovery] Cluster should restore itself after quorum loss [Serial]
is failing frequently in CI, see search results:
https://search.ci.openshift.org/?maxAge=168h&context=1&type=bug%2Bjunit&name=&maxMatches=5&maxBytes=20971520&groupBy=job&search=%5C%5Bsig-etcd%5C%5D%5C%5BFeature%3ADisasterRecovery%5C%5D%5C%5BDisruptive%5C%5D+%5C%5BFeature%3AEtcdRecovery%5C%5D+Cluster+should+restore+itself+after+quorum+loss+%5C%5BSerial%5C%5D
https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/origin-ci-test/logs/release-openshift-origin-installer-e2e-aws-disruptive-4.8/1413625606435770368
https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/origin-ci-test/logs/release-openshift-origin-installer-e2e-aws-disruptive-4.8/1415075413717159936
—
some brief triaging from Thomas Jungblut on:
https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/origin-ci-test/logs/release-openshift-origin-installer-e2e-aws-disruptive-4.11/1568747321334697984
it seems the last guard pod doesn't come up, etcd operator installs this properly and the revision installer also does not spout any errors. It just doesn't progress to the latest revision. At first glance doesn't look like an issue with etcd itself, but needs to be taken a closer look at for sure.
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-7885. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-7617. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:
Azure Disk volume is taking time to attach/detach
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Openshift ARO 4.10.30
How reproducible:
While performing scaledown and scaleup of statefulset pod takes time to attach and detach volume from nodes.
Reviewed must-gather and test output will share my findings in comments.
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
Actual results:
Expected results:
Additional info:
This bug is a backport clone of [Bugzilla Bug 2094362](https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2094362). The following is the description of the original bug:
—
Description of problem:
A change [1] was introduced to split the kube-apiserver SLO rules into 2 groups to reduce the load on Prometheus (see bug 2004585).
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.9 (because the change was backported to 4.9.z)
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install OCP 4.9
2. Retrieve kube-apiserver-slos*
oc get -n openshift-kube-apiserver prometheusrules kube-apiserver-slos -o yaml
oc get -n openshift-kube-apiserver prometheusrules kube-apiserver-slos-basic -o yaml
Actual results:
The KubeAPIErrorBudgetBurn alert with labels
{long="1h",namespace="openshift-kube-apiserver",severity="critical",short="5m"}exists both in kube-apiserver-slos and kube-apiserver-slos-basic.
The alerting rules is evaluated twice. The same is true for recording rules like "apiserver_request:burnrate1h" and in this case, it can trigger warning logs in the Prometheus pods:
> level=warn component="rule manager" group=kube-apiserver.rules msg="Error on ingesting out-of-order result from rule evaluation" numDropped=283
Expected results:
I presume that kube-apiserver-slos shouldn't exist since it's been replaced by kube-apiserver-slos-basic and kube-apiserver-slos-extended.
Additional info:
Discovered while investigating bug 2091902
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-5185. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-5165. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Currently, the Dev Sandbox clusters sends the clusterType "OSD" instead of "DEVSANDBOX" because the configuration annotations of the console config are automatically overridden by some SyncSets.
Open Dev Sandbox and browser console and inspect window.SERVER_FLAGS.telemetry
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-7458. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:
- After upgrading to OCP 4.10.41, thanos-ruler-user-workload-1 in the openshift-user-workload-monitoring namespace is consistently being created and deleted. - We had to scale down the Prometheus operator multiple times so that the upgrade is considered as successful. - This fix is temporary. After some time it appears again and Prometheus operator needs to be scaled down and up again. - The issue is present on all clusters in this customer environment which are upgraded to 4.10.41.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
N/A, I wasn't able to reproduce the issue.
Steps to Reproduce:
Actual results:
Expected results:
Additional info:
Description of problem:
The reconciler removes the overlappingrangeipreservations.whereabouts.cni.cncf.io resources whether the pod is alive or not.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Create pods and check the overlappingrangeipreservations.whereabouts.cni.cncf.io resources:
$ oc get overlappingrangeipreservations.whereabouts.cni.cncf.io -A NAMESPACE NAME AGE openshift-multus 2001-1b70-820d-4b04--13 4m53s openshift-multus 2001-1b70-820d-4b05--13 4m49s
2. Verify that when the ip-reconciler cronjob removes the overlappingrangeipreservations.whereabouts.cni.cncf.io resources when run:
$ oc get cronjob -n openshift-multus NAME SCHEDULE SUSPEND ACTIVE LAST SCHEDULE AGE ip-reconciler */15 * * * * False 0 14m 4d13h $ oc get overlappingrangeipreservations.whereabouts.cni.cncf.io -A No resources found $ oc get cronjob -n openshift-multus NAME SCHEDULE SUSPEND ACTIVE LAST SCHEDULE AGE ip-reconciler */15 * * * * False 0 5s 4d13h
Actual results:
The overlappingrangeipreservations.whereabouts.cni.cncf.io resources are removed for each created pod by the ip-reconciler cronjob. The "overlapping ranges" are not used.
Expected results:
The overlappingrangeipreservations.whereabouts.cni.cncf.io should not be removed regardless of if a pod has used an IP in the overlapping ranges.
Additional info:
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-533. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:
customer is using Azure AD as openid provider and groups synchronization from the provider.
The scenario is the following:
1)
2)
3)
The groups memberships are the same in step 2 and 3.
The cluster role bindings of the groups have never changed.
the only way to have user A again the admin rights is to delete the membership from the group and have user A login again.
I have not managed to reproduce this using RH SSO. Neither Azure AD.
But my configuration is not exactly the same yet.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
Actual results:
Expected results:
Additional info:
Description of problem:
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
Steps to Reproduce:
1. 2. 3.
Actual results:
Expected results:
Additional info:
Discovered in the must gather kubelet_service.log from https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/origin-ci-test/logs/periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.12-upgrade-from-stable-4.11-e2e-gcp-sdn-upgrade/1586093220087992320
It appears the guard pod names are too long, and being truncated down to where they will collide with those from the other masters.
From kubelet logs in this run:
❯ grep openshift-kube-scheduler-guard-ci-op-3hj6pnwf-4f6ab-lv57z-maste kubelet_service.log Oct 28 23:58:55.693391 ci-op-3hj6pnwf-4f6ab-lv57z-master-1 kubenswrapper[1657]: E1028 23:58:55.693346 1657 kubelet_pods.go:413] "Hostname for pod was too long, truncated it" podName="openshift-kube-scheduler-guard-ci-op-3hj6pnwf-4f6ab-lv57z-master-1" hostnameMaxLen=63 truncatedHostname="openshift-kube-scheduler-guard-ci-op-3hj6pnwf-4f6ab-lv57z-maste" Oct 28 23:59:03.735726 ci-op-3hj6pnwf-4f6ab-lv57z-master-0 kubenswrapper[1670]: E1028 23:59:03.735671 1670 kubelet_pods.go:413] "Hostname for pod was too long, truncated it" podName="openshift-kube-scheduler-guard-ci-op-3hj6pnwf-4f6ab-lv57z-master-0" hostnameMaxLen=63 truncatedHostname="openshift-kube-scheduler-guard-ci-op-3hj6pnwf-4f6ab-lv57z-maste" Oct 28 23:59:11.168082 ci-op-3hj6pnwf-4f6ab-lv57z-master-2 kubenswrapper[1667]: E1028 23:59:11.168041 1667 kubelet_pods.go:413] "Hostname for pod was too long, truncated it" podName="openshift-kube-scheduler-guard-ci-op-3hj6pnwf-4f6ab-lv57z-master-2" hostnameMaxLen=63 truncatedHostname="openshift-kube-scheduler-guard-ci-op-3hj6pnwf-4f6ab-lv57z-maste"
This also looks to be happening for openshift-kube-scheduler-guard, kube-controller-manager-guard, possibly others.
Looks like they should be truncated further to make room for random suffixes in https://github.com/openshift/library-go/blame/bd9b0e19121022561dcd1d9823407cd58b2265d0/pkg/operator/staticpod/controller/guard/guard_controller.go#L97-L98
Unsure of the implications here, it looks a little scary.
Description of problem:
NodePort port not accessible
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
OCP 4.8.20
How reproducible:
$oc -n ui-nprd get services -o wide
NAME TYPE CLUSTER-IP EXTERNAL-IP PORT(S) AGE SELECTOR
docker-registry ClusterIP 10.201.219.240 <none> 5000/TCP 24d app=registry
docker-registry-lb LoadBalancer 10.201.252.253 internal-xxxxxx.xx-xxxx-1.elb.amazonaws.com 5000:30779/TCP 3d22h app=registry
docker-registry-np NodePort 10.201.216.26 <none> 5000:32428/TCP 3d16h app=registry
$oc debug node/ip-xxx.ca-central-1.compute.internal
Starting pod/ip-xxx.ca-central-1computeinternal-debug ...
To use host binaries, run `chroot /host`
Pod IP: 10.81.23.96
If you don't see a command prompt, try pressing enter.
sh-4.2# chroot /host
sh-4.4# nc -vz 10.81.23.96 32428
Ncat: Version 7.70 ( https://nmap.org/ncat )
Ncat: Connection timed out.
In a new-created namespaces the same deployment works:
[RHEL7:> oc project
Using project "test-c1" on server "https://api.xx.xx.xxxx.xx.xx:6443".
[RHEL7:- ~/tmp]> oc port-forward service/docker-registry-np 5000:5000
Forwarding from 127.0.0.1:5000 -> 5000
[1]+ Stopped oc4 port-forward service/docker-registry-np 5000:5000
[RHEL7: ~/tmp]> bg %1
[1]+ oc4 port-forward service/docker-registry-np 5000:5000 &
[RHEL7: ~/tmp]> nc -v localhost 5000
Ncat: Version 7.50 ( https://nmap.org/ncat )
Ncat: Connected to 127.0.0.1:5000.
Handling connection for 5000
[RHEL7: ~/tmp]> kill %1
[RHEL7: ~/tmp]>
[1]+ Terminated oc4 port-forward service/docker-registry-np 5000:5000
[RHEL7: ~/tmp]> oc get services
NAME TYPE CLUSTER-IP EXTERNAL-IP PORT(S) AGE
docker-registry-np NodePort 10.201.224.174 <none> 5000:31793/TCP 68s
[RHEL7: ~/tmp]> oc get pods -o wide
NAME READY STATUS RESTARTS AGE IP NODE NOMINATED NODE READINESS GATES
registry-75b7c7fd94-rx29j 1/1 Running 0 7m5s 10.201.1.29 ip-xxx.ca-central-1.compute.internal <none> <none>
[RHEL7: ~/tmp]> oc debug node/ip-xxx.ca-central-1.compute.internal
Starting pod/ip-xxxca-central-1computeinternal-debug ...
To use host binaries, run `chroot /host`
Pod IP: 10.81.23.87
If you don't see a command prompt, try pressing enter.
sh-4.2# chroot /host
sh-4.4# nc -v 10.81.23.87 31793
Ncat: Version 7.70 ( https://nmap.org/ncat )
Ncat: Connected to 10.81.23.87:31793.
Actual results:
Expected results:
Additional info:
This fix contains the following changes coming from updated version of kubernetes up to v1.24.10:
Changelog:
v1.24.11: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/release-1.24/CHANGELOG/CHANGELOG-1.24.md#changelog-since-v12410
v1.24.10: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/release-1.24/CHANGELOG/CHANGELOG-1.24.md#changelog-since-v1249
v1.24.9: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/release-1.24/CHANGELOG/CHANGELOG-1.24.md#changelog-since-v1248
v1.24.8: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/release-1.24/CHANGELOG/CHANGELOG-1.24.md#changelog-since-v1247
v1.24.7: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/release-1.24/CHANGELOG/CHANGELOG-1.24.md#changelog-since-v1246
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-8044. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
rhbz#2089199, backported to 4.11.5, shifted the etcd Grafana dashboard from the monitoring operator to the etcd operator. During the shift, the ConfigMap was renamed from grafana-dashboard-etcd to etcd-dashboard. However, we did not include logic for garbage-collecting the obsolete dasboard, so clusters that update from 4.11.1 and similar into 4.11.>=5 or 4.12+ currently end up with both the obsolete and new ConfigMaps. We should grow code to remove the obsolete ConfigMap.
4.11.>=5 and 4.12+ are currently exposed.
100%
1. Install 4.11.1.
2. Update to a release that defines the etcd-dashboard ConfigMap.
3. Check for etcd dashboards with oc -n openshift-config-managed get configmaps | grep etcd.
Both etcd-dashboard and grafana-dashboard-etcd exist:
$ oc -n openshift-config-managed get configmaps | grep etcd etcd-dashboard 1 196d grafana-dashboard-etcd 1 2y282d
Another example is 4.11.1 to 4.11.5 CI:
$ curl -s https://gcsweb-ci.apps.ci.l2s4.p1.openshiftapps.com/gcs/origin-ci-test/logs/release-openshift-origin-installer-e2e-aws-upgrade/1570415394001260544/artifacts/e2e-aws-upgrade/configmaps.json | jq -r '.items[].metadata | select(.namespace == "openshift-config-managed" and (.name | contains("etcd"))) | .name' etcd-dashboard grafana-dashboard-etcd
Only etcd-dashboard still exists.
A new manifest for the outgoing ConfigMap that sets the release.openshift.io/delete: "true" annotation would ask the cluster-version operator to reap the obsolete ConfigMap.
We will want to establish some basic metrics we can report back to Telemetry.
Let's consider:
Below is some background info from MTC when we added Telemetry support that may help
See: https://github.com/konveyor/metrics-queries/blob/master/README.md
Design/Development info:
OpenShift Monitoring Integration Guide
Monitoring integration with OLM operators
https://www.openshift.com/blog/observability-superpower-correlation
Source Code:
https://github.com/konveyor/mig-controller/blob/master/pkg/controller/migmigration/metrics.go
Description of problem:
When a pod runs to a completed state, we typically rely on the update event that will indicate to us that this pod is completed. At that point the pod IP is released and the port configuration is removed in OVN. The subsequent delete event for this pod will be ignored because it should have been cleaned up in the previous update. However, there can be cases where the update event is missed with pod completed. In this case we will only receive a delete with pod completed event, and ignore tearing down the pod. The end result is the pod is not cleaned up in OVN and the IP address remains allocated, reducing the amount of address range available to launch another pod. This can lead to exhausting all IP addresses available for pod allocation on a node.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.10.24
How reproducible:
Not sure how to reproduce this. I'm guessing some lag in kapi updates can cause the completed update event and the final delete event to be combined into a single event.
Steps to Reproduce:
1. 2. 3.
Actual results:
Port still exists in OVN, IP remains allocated for a deleted pod.
Expected results:
IP should be freed, port should be removed from OVN.
Additional info:
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-5019. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-4941. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem: This is a follow-up to OCPBUGS-3933.
The installer fails to destroy the cluster when the OpenStack object storage omits 'content-type' from responses, and a container is empty.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.8.z
How reproducible:
Likely not happening in customer environments where Swift is exposed directly. We're seeing the issue in our CI where we're using a non-RHOSP managed cloud.
Steps to Reproduce:
1. 2. 3.
Actual results:
Expected results:
Additional info:
Tracker bug for bootimage bump in 4.11. This bug should block bugs which need a bootimage bump to fix.
1. Proposed title of this feature request
--> Alert generation when the etcd container memory consumption goes beyond 90%
2. What is the nature and description of the request?
--> When the etcd database starts growing rapidly due to some high number of objects like secrets, events, or configmap generation by application/workload, the memory and CPU consumption of APIserver and etcd container (control plane component) spikes up and eventually the control plane nodes goes to hung/unresponsive or crash due to out of memory errors as some of the critical processes/services running on master nodes get killed. Hence we request an alert/alarm when the ETCD container's memory consumption goes beyond 90% so that the cluster administrator can take some action before the cluster/nodes go unresponsive.
I see we already have a etcdExcessiveDatabaseGrowth Prometheus rule which helps when the surge in etcd writes leading to a 50% increase in database size over the past four hours on etcd instance however it does not consider the memory consumption:
$ oc get prometheusrules etcd-prometheus-rules -o yaml|grep -i etcdExcessiveDatabaseGrowth -A 9
- alert: etcdExcessiveDatabaseGrowth
annotations:
description: 'etcd cluster "{{ $labels.job }}": Observed surge in etcd writes
leading to 50% increase in database size over the past four hours on etcd
instance {{ $labels.instance }}, please check as it might be disruptive.'
expr: |
increase(((etcd_mvcc_db_total_size_in_bytes/etcd_server_quota_backend_bytes)*100)[240m:1m]) > 50
for: 10m
labels:
severity: warning
3. Why does the customer need this? (List the business requirements here)
--> Once the etcd memory consumption goes beyond 90-95% of total ram as it's system critical container, the OCP cluster goes unresponsive causing revenue loss to business and impacting the productivity of users of the openshift cluster.
4. List any affected packages or components.
--> etcd
This bug is a backport clone of [Bugzilla Bug 2118318](https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2118318). The following is the description of the original bug:
—
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #2117569 +++
Description of problem:
The garbage collector resource quota controller must ignore ALL events; otherwise, if a rogue controller or a workload causes unbound event creation, performance will degrade as it has to process the events.
Fix: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/110939
This bug is to track fix in master (4.12) and also allow to backport to 4.11.1
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
Actual results:
Expected results:
Additional info:
— Additional comment from Michal Fojtik on 2022-08-11 10:52:28 UTC —
I'm using FastFix here as we need to backport this to 4.11.1 to avoid support churn for busy clusters or clusters doing upgrades.
— Additional comment from ART BZ Bot on 2022-08-11 15:13:32 UTC —
Elliott changed bug status from MODIFIED to ON_QA.
This bug is expected to ship in the next 4.12 release.
— Additional comment from zhou ying on 2022-08-12 03:03:34 UTC —
checked the payload commit id , the payload 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-08-11-191750 has container the fixed pr .
oc adm release info registry.ci.openshift.org/ocp/release:4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-08-11-191750 --commit-urls |grep hyperkube
Warning: the default reading order of registry auth file will be changed from "${HOME}/.docker/config.json" to podman registry config locations in the future version. "${HOME}/.docker/config.json" is deprecated, but can still be used for storing credentials as a fallback. See https://github.com/containers/image/blob/main/docs/containers-auth.json.5.md for the order of podman registry config locations.
hyperkube https://github.com/openshift/kubernetes/commit/da80cd038ee5c3b45ba36d4b48b42eb8a74439a3
commit da80cd038ee5c3b45ba36d4b48b42eb8a74439a3 (HEAD -> master, origin/release-4.13, origin/release-4.12, origin/master, origin/HEAD)
Merge: a9d6306a701 055b96e614a
Author: OpenShift Merge Robot <openshift-merge-robot@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Thu Aug 11 15:13:05 2022 +0000
Merge pull request #1338 from benluddy/openshift-pick-110888
Bug 2117569: UPSTREAM: 110888: feat: fix a bug thaat not all event be ignored by gc controller
Description of problem:
intra namespace allow network policy doesn't work after applying ingress&egress deny all network policy
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
OpenShift 4.10.12
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Define deny all network policy for egress an ingress in a namespace:
apiVersion: networking.k8s.io/v1
kind: NetworkPolicy
metadata:
name: default-deny-all
spec:
podSelector: {}
policyTypes:
- Ingress
- Egress
2. Define the following network policy to allow the traffic between the pods in the namespace:
apiVersion: networking.k8s.io/v1 kind: NetworkPolicy metadata: name: allow-intra-namespace-001 spec: egress: - to: - podSelector: {} ingress: - from: - podSelector: {} podSelector: {} policyTypes: - Ingress - Egress
3. Test the connectivity between two pods from the namespace.
Actual results:
The connectivity is not allowed
Expected results:
The connectivity should be allowed between pods from the same namespace.
Additional info:
After performing a test and analyzing SDN flows for the namespace:
sh-4.4# ovs-ofctl dump-flows -O OpenFlow13 br0 | grep --color 0x964376 cookie=0x0, duration=99375.342s, table=20, n_packets=14, n_bytes=588, priority=100,arp,in_port=21,arp_spa=10.128.2.20,arp_sha=00:00:0a:80:02:14/00:00:ff:ff:ff:ff actions=load:0x964376->NXM_NX_REG0[],goto_table:30 cookie=0x0, duration=1681.845s, table=20, n_packets=11, n_bytes=462, priority=100,arp,in_port=24,arp_spa=10.128.2.23,arp_sha=00:00:0a:80:02:17/00:00:ff:ff:ff:ff actions=load:0x964376->NXM_NX_REG0[],goto_table:30 cookie=0x0, duration=99375.342s, table=20, n_packets=135610, n_bytes=759239814, priority=100,ip,in_port=21,nw_src=10.128.2.20 actions=load:0x964376->NXM_NX_REG0[],goto_table:27 cookie=0x0, duration=1681.845s, table=20, n_packets=2006, n_bytes=12684967, priority=100,ip,in_port=24,nw_src=10.128.2.23 actions=load:0x964376->NXM_NX_REG0[],goto_table:27 cookie=0x0, duration=99375.342s, table=25, n_packets=0, n_bytes=0, priority=100,ip,nw_src=10.128.2.20 actions=load:0x964376->NXM_NX_REG0[],goto_table:27 cookie=0x0, duration=1681.845s, table=25, n_packets=0, n_bytes=0, priority=100,ip,nw_src=10.128.2.23 actions=load:0x964376->NXM_NX_REG0[],goto_table:27 cookie=0x0, duration=975.129s, table=27, n_packets=0, n_bytes=0, priority=150,reg0=0x964376,reg1=0x964376 actions=goto_table:30 cookie=0x0, duration=99375.342s, table=70, n_packets=145260, n_bytes=11722173, priority=100,ip,nw_dst=10.128.2.20 actions=load:0x964376->NXM_NX_REG1[],load:0x15->NXM_NX_REG2[],goto_table:80 cookie=0x0, duration=1681.845s, table=70, n_packets=2336, n_bytes=191079, priority=100,ip,nw_dst=10.128.2.23 actions=load:0x964376->NXM_NX_REG1[],load:0x18->NXM_NX_REG2[],goto_table:80 cookie=0x0, duration=975.129s, table=80, n_packets=0, n_bytes=0, priority=150,reg0=0x964376,reg1=0x964376 actions=output:NXM_NX_REG2[]
We see that the following rule doesn't match because `reg1` hasn't been defined:
cookie=0x0, duration=975.129s, table=27, n_packets=0, n_bytes=0, priority=150,reg0=0x964376,reg1=0x964376 actions=goto_table:30
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-4805. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-4101. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:
We experienced two separate upgrade failures relating to the introduction of the SYSTEM_RESERVED_ES node sizing parameter, causing kubelet to stop running. One cluster (clusterA) upgraded from 4.11.14 to 4.11.17. It experienced an issue whereby /etc/node-sizing.env on its master nodes contained an empty SYSTEM_RESERVED_ES value: --- cat /etc/node-sizing.env SYSTEM_RESERVED_MEMORY=5.36Gi SYSTEM_RESERVED_CPU=0.11 SYSTEM_RESERVED_ES= --- causing the kubelet to not start up. To restore service, this file was manually updated to set a value (1Gi), and kubelet was restarted. We are uncertain what conditions led to this occuring on the clusterA master nodes as part of the upgrade. A second cluster (clusterB) upgraded from 4.11.16 to 4.11.17. It experienced an issue whereby worker nodes were impacted by a similar problem, however this was because a custom node-sizing-enabled.env MachineConfig which did not set SYSTEM_RESERVED_ES This caused existing worker nodes to go into a NotReady state after the ugprade, and additionally new nodes did not join the cluster as their kubelet would become impacted. For clusterB the conditions are more well-known of why the value is empty. However, for both clusters, if SYSTEM_RESERVED_ES ends up as empty on a node it can cause the kubelet to not start. We have some asks as a result: - Can MCO be made to recover from this situation if it occurs, perhaps through application of a safe default if none exists, such that kubelet would start correctly? - Can there possibly be alerting that could indicate and draw attention to the misconfiguration?
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.11.17
How reproducible:
Have not been able to reproduce it on a fresh cluster upgrading from 4.11.16 to 4.11.17
Expected results:
If SYSTEM_RESERVED_ES is empty in /etc/node-sizing*env then a default should be applied and/or kubelet able to continue running.
Additional info:
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-6755. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-3316. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:
Branch name in repository pipelineruns list view should match the actual github branch name.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.11.z
How reproducible:
alwaus
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Create a repository 2. Trigger the pipelineruns by push or pull request event on the github
Actual results:
Branch name contains "refs-heads-" prefix in front of the actual branch name eg: "refs-heads-cicd-demo" (cicd-demo is the branch name)
Expected results:
Branch name should be the acutal github branch name. just `cicd-demo`should be shown in the branch column.
Additional info:
Ref: https://coreos.slack.com/archives/CHG0KRB7G/p1667564311865459
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-6766. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
This is a clone of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2083087 (OCPBUGSM-44070) to backport this issue.
Description of problem:
"Delete dependent objects of this resource" is a bit of confusing for some users because when creating the Application in Dev console not only the deployment but also IS, route, svc, secret objects will be created as well. When deleting the Application (in fact it is deployment), there is an option called "Delete dependent objects of this resource" and some users might think this means the IS, route, svc and any other objects which are created alongside with the deployment will be deleted as well
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.8
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Create Application in Dev console
2. Delete the deployment
3. Check "Delete dependent objects of this resource"
Actual results:
Only deployment will be deleted and IS, svc, route will not be deleted
Expected results:
We either change the description of this option, or we really delete IS, svc, route and any other objects created under this Application.
Additional info:
Description of problem:
Sometimes we see VMs fail to power on when the land on a host that does not have enough resources. The current power on does not retry or leverage DRS to power on the node on a suitable host.
https://github.com/vmware/govmomi/issues/1026
Our code is still making calls to PowerOnVM_Task which, according to the vsphere docs, is deprecated and we should use PowerOnMultiVM_Task instead.
PowerOnVM_Task does not return a DRS ClusterRecommendation, no vmotion nor host power operations will be done as part of a DRS-facilitated power on. To have DRS consider such operations use PowerOnMultiVM_Task.
https://vdc-download.vmware.com/vmwb-repository/dcr-public/b50dcbbf-051d-4204-a3e7-e1b618c1e384/538cf2ec-b34f-4bae-a332-3820ef9e7773/vim.VirtualMachine.html#powerOn:
As of vSphere API 5.1, use of this method with vCenter Server is deprecated; use PowerOnMultiVM_Task instead.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.8.x
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
Actual results:
Sometimes powers on fails requiring manual intervention.
Expected results:
PowerOn should use DRS to ensure it's always successful.
Additional info:
Description of problem:
This repository is out of sync with the downstream product builds for this component.
One or more images differ from those being used by ART to create product builds. This
should be addressed to ensure that the component's CI testing is accurately
reflecting what customers will experience.
The information within the following ART component metadata is driving this alignment
request: ose-baremetal-installer.yml.
The vast majority of these PRs are opened because a different Golang version is being
used to build the downstream component. ART compiles most components with the version
of Golang being used by the control plane for a given OpenShift release. Exceptions
to this convention (i.e. you believe your component must be compiled with a Golang
version independent from the control plane) must be granted by the OpenShift
architecture team and communicated to the ART team.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 4.11
Additional info: This issue is needed for the bot-created PR to merge after the 4.11 GA.
Description of problem:
In order to understand what is going on with OCPBUGS-5379 we want to add more logs
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
Steps to Reproduce:
1. 2. 3.
Actual results:
Expected results:
Additional info:
Origin tests for the bond-cni
Backport of https://github.com/openshift/origin/pull/27405
Description of problem:
-----------------------
On dualstack baremetal IPI cluster next error message is present in ovnkube logs:
oc logs -n openshift-ovn-kubernetes ovnkube-node-rvggh -c ovnkube-node
...
E0810 02:12:46.343460 353971 node_linux.go:593] Failed to dump flows for flow sync, stderr: "ovs-ofctl: br-ext is not a bridge or a socket\n", error: exit status 1
E0810 02:13:16.347603 353971 node_linux.go:593] Failed to dump flows for flow sync, stderr: "ovs-ofctl: br-ext is not a bridge or a socket\n", error: exit status 1
E0810 02:13:46.351108 353971 node_linux.go:593] Failed to dump flows for flow sync, stderr: "ovs-ofctl: br-ext is not a bridge or a socket\n", error: exit status 1
E0810 02:14:16.355047 353971 node_linux.go:593] Failed to dump flows for flow sync, stderr: "ovs-ofctl: br-ext is not a bridge or a socket\n", error: exit status 1
E0810 02:14:46.358950 353971 node_linux.go:593] Failed to dump flows for flow sync, stderr: "ovs-ofctl: br-ext is not a bridge or a socket\n", error: exit status 1
I0810 02:15:13.313945 353971 reflector.go:535] k8s.io/client-go/informers/factory.go:134: Watch close - *v1.Service total 9 items received
E0810 02:15:16.362737 353971 node_linux.go:593] Failed to dump flows for flow sync, stderr: "ovs-ofctl: br-ext is not a bridge or a socket\n", error: exit status 1
E0810 02:15:46.366490 353971 node_linux.go:593] Failed to dump flows for flow sync, stderr: "ovs-ofctl: br-ext is not a bridge or a socket\n", error: exit status 1
E0810 02:16:16.369963 353971 node_linux.go:593] Failed to dump flows for flow sync, stderr: "ovs-ofctl: br-ext is not a bridge or a socket\n", error: exit status 1
I0810 02:16:24.306561 353971 reflector.go:535] k8s.io/client-go/informers/factory.go:134: Watch close - *v1.Endpoints total 560 items received
E0810 02:16:46.373482 353971 node_linux.go:593] Failed to dump flows for flow sync, stderr: "ovs-ofctl: br-ext is not a bridge or a socket\n", error: exit status 1
E0810 02:17:16.377497 353971 node_linux.go:593] Failed to dump flows for flow sync, stderr: "ovs-ofctl: br-ext is not a bridge or a socket\n", error: exit status 1
E0810 02:17:46.380726 353971 node_linux.go:593] Failed to dump flows for flow sync, stderr: "ovs-ofctl: br-ext is not a bridge or a socket\n", error: exit status 1
I0810 02:18:15.325871 353971 reflector.go:535] k8s.io/client-go/informers/factory.go:134: Watch close - *v1.Node total 50 items received
E0810 02:18:16.384732 353971 node_linux.go:593] Failed to dump flows for flow sync, stderr: "ovs-ofctl: br-ext is not a bridge or a socket\n", error: exit status 1
I0810 02:18:38.299738 353971 reflector.go:535] k8s.io/client-go/informers/factory.go:134: Watch close - *v1.Pod total 9 items received
E0810 02:18:46.388162 353971 node_linux.go:593] Failed to dump flows for flow sync, stderr: "ovs-ofctl: br-ext is not a bridge or a socket\n", error: exit status 1
E0810 02:19:16.391669 353971 node_linux.go:593] Failed to dump flows for flow sync, stderr: "ovs-ofctl: br-ext is not a bridge or a socket\n", error: exit status 1
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
-------------------------------------------------------------
OCP-4.10.26
ovn-2021-21.12.0-58.el8fdp.x86_64
ovn-2021-host-21.12.0-58.el8fdp.x86_64
ovn-2021-central-21.12.0-58.el8fdp.x86_64
ovn-2021-vtep-21.12.0-58.el8fdp.x86_64
How reproducible:
-----------------
so far spotted on 2 different clusters
Steps to Reproduce:
-------------------
1. Deploy dualstack baremetal IPI cluster with OVNKubernetesHybrid network(add next to cluster's config before running cluster install):
defaultNetwork:
type: OVNKubernetes
ovnKubernetesConfig:
hybridOverlayConfig:
hybridClusterNetwork: []
Actual results:
---------------
Error message in logs
Expected results:
-----------------
No error message in logs
Additional info:
----------------
Baremetal dualstack setup with 3 masters and 4 workers, bonding configured for baremetal network on masters and workers
Tracker issue for bootimage bump in 4.11. This issue should block issues which need a bootimage bump to fix.
The previous bump was OCPBUGS-562.
Description of problem:
The ovn-kubernetes ovnkube-master containers are continuously crashlooping since we updated to 4.11.0-0.okd-2022-10-15-073651.
Log Excerpt:
] [] [] [{kubectl-client-side-apply Update networking.k8s.io/v1 2022-09-12 12:25:06 +0000 UTC FieldsV1 {"f:metadata":{"f:annotations":{".":{},"f:kubectl.kubernetes.io/last-applied-configuration":{}}},"f:spec":{"f:ingress":{},"f:policyTypes":{}}} }]},Spec:NetworkPolicySpec{PodSelector:{map[] []},Ingress:[]NetworkPolicyIngressRule{NetworkPolicyIngressRule{Ports:[]NetworkPolicyPort{},From:[]NetworkPolicyPeer{NetworkPolicyPeer{PodSelector:&v1.LabelSelector{MatchLabels:map[string]string{access: true,},MatchExpressions:[]LabelSelectorRequirement{},},NamespaceSelector:nil,IPBlock:nil,},},},},Egress:[]NetworkPolicyEgressRule{},PolicyTypes:[Ingress],},} &NetworkPolicy{ObjectMeta:{allow-from-openshift-ingress compsci-gradcentral a405f843-c250-40d7-8dd4-a759f764f091 217304038 1 2022-09-22 14:36:38 +0000 UTC <nil> <nil> map[] map[] [] [] [{openshift-apiserver Update networking.k8s.io/v1 2022-09-22 14:36:38 +0000 UTC FieldsV1 {"f:spec":{"f:ingress":{},"f:policyTypes":{}}} }]},Spec:NetworkPolicySpec{PodSelector:{map[] []},Ingress:[]NetworkPolicyIngressRule{NetworkPolicyIngressRule{Ports:[]NetworkPolicyPort{},From:[]NetworkPolicyPeer{NetworkPolicyPeer{PodSelector:nil,NamespaceSelector:&v1.LabelSelector{MatchLabels:map[string]string{policy-group.network.openshift.io/ingress: ,},MatchExpressions:[]LabelSelectorRequirement{},},IPBlock:nil,},},},},Egress:[]NetworkPolicyEgressRule{},PolicyTypes:[Ingress],},}]: cannot clean up egress default deny ACL name: error in transact with ops [{Op:mutate Table:Port_Group Row:map[] Rows:[] Columns:[] Mutations:[{Column:acls Mutator:delete Value:{GoSet:[{GoUUID:60cb946a-46e9-4623-9ba4-3cb35f018ed6}]}}] Timeout:<nil> Where:[where column _uuid == {ccdd01bf-3009-42fb-9672-e1df38190cd7}] Until: Durable:<nil> Comment:<nil> Lock:<nil> UUIDName:} {Op:mutate Table:Port_Group Row:map[] Rows:[] Columns:[] Mutations:[{Column:acls Mutator:delete Value:{GoSet:[{GoUUID:60cb946a-46e9-4623-9ba4-3cb35f018ed6}]}}] Timeout:<nil> Where:[where column _uuid == {10bbf229-8c1b-4c62-b36e-4ba0097722db}] Until: Durable:<nil> Comment:<nil> Lock:<nil> UUIDName:} {Op:delete Table:ACL Row:map[] Rows:[] Columns:[] Mutations:[] Timeout:<nil> Where:[where column _uuid == {7b55ba0c-150f-4a63-9601-cfde25f29408}] Until: Durable:<nil> Comment:<nil> Lock:<nil> UUIDName:} {Op:delete Table:ACL Row:map[] Rows:[] Columns:[] Mutations:[] Timeout:<nil> Where:[where column _uuid == {60cb946a-46e9-4623-9ba4-3cb35f018ed6}] Until: Durable:<nil> Comment:<nil> Lock:<nil> UUIDName:}] results [{Count:1 Error: Details: UUID:{GoUUID:} Rows:[]} {Count:1 Error: Details: UUID:{GoUUID:} Rows:[]} {Count:1 Error: Details: UUID:{GoUUID:} Rows:[]} {Count:1 Error: Details: UUID:{GoUUID:} Rows:[]} {Count:0 Error:referential integrity violation Details:cannot delete ACL row 7b55ba0c-150f-4a63-9601-cfde25f29408 because of 1 remaining reference(s) UUID:{GoUUID:} Rows:[]}] and errors []: referential integrity violation: cannot delete ACL row 7b55ba0c-150f-4a63-9601-cfde25f29408 because of 1 remaining reference(s)
Additional info:
https://github.com/okd-project/okd/issues/1372 Issue persisted through update to 4.11.0-0.okd-2022-10-28-153352 must-gather: https://nbc9-snips.cloud.duke.edu/snips/must-gather.local.2859117512952590880.zip
Description of problem:
Whereabouts doesn't allow the use of network interface names that are not preceded by the prefix "net", see https://github.com/k8snetworkplumbingwg/whereabouts/issues/130.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Define two Pods, one with the interface name 'port1' and the other with 'net-port1':
test-ip-removal-port1: k8s.v1.cni.cncf.io/networks: [ { "name": "test-sriovnd", "interface": "port1", "namespace": "default" } ] test-ip-removal-net-port1: k8s.v1.cni.cncf.io/networks: [ { "name": "test-sriovnd", "interface": "net-port1", "namespace": "default" } ]
2. IP allocated in the IPPool:
kind: IPPool ... spec: allocations: "16": id: ... podref: test-ecoloma-1/test-ip-removal-port1 "17": id: ... podref: test-ecoloma-1/test-ip-removal-net-port1
3. When the ip-reconciler job is run, the allocation for the port with the interface name 'port1' is removed:
[13:29][]$ oc get cronjob -n openshift-multus
NAME SCHEDULE SUSPEND ACTIVE LAST SCHEDULE AGE
ip-reconciler */15 * * * * False 0 14m 11d
[13:29][]$ oc get ippools.whereabouts.cni.cncf.io -n openshift-multus 2001-1b70-820d-2610---64 -o yaml
apiVersion: whereabouts.cni.cncf.io/v1alpha1
kind: IPPool
metadata:
...
spec:
allocations:
"17":
id: ...
podref: test-ecoloma-1/test-ip-removal-net-port1
range: 2001:1b70:820d:2610::/64
[13:30][]$ oc get cronjob -n openshift-multus
NAME SCHEDULE SUSPEND ACTIVE LAST SCHEDULE AGE
ip-reconciler */15 * * * * False 0 9s 11d
Actual results:
The network interface with a name that doesn't have a 'net' prefix is removed from the ip-reconciler cronjob.
Expected results:
The network interface must not be removed, regardless of the name.
Additional info:
Upstream PR @ https://github.com/k8snetworkplumbingwg/whereabouts/pull/147 master PR @ https://github.com/openshift/whereabouts-cni/pull/94
Description of problem:
Users on a fully-disconnected cluster could not see Devfiles in the developer catalog or import a Devfiles. That's fine.
But the API calls /api/devfile/samples/ and /api/devfile/ takes 30 seconds until they fail with a 504 Gateway timeout error.
If possible they should fail immediately.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
This might happen since 4.8
Tested this yet only on 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-07-112008
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
Actual results:
Expected results:
Additional info:
The console Pod log contains this error:
E0909 10:28:18.448680 1 devfile-handler.go:74] Failed to parse devfile: failed to populateAndParseDevfile: Get "https://registry.devfile.io/devfiles/go": context deadline exceeded (Client.Timeout exceeded while awaiting headers)
Description of problem:
release-4.11 of openshift/cloud-provider-openstack is missing some commits that were backported in upstream project into the release-1.24 branch. We should import them in our downstream fork.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
Steps to Reproduce:
1. 2. 3.
Actual results:
Expected results:
Additional info:
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-4422. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
This bug is a backport clone of [Bugzilla Bug 2050230](https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050230). The following is the description of the original bug:
—
Description of problem:
In a large cluster, sdn daemonset can DoS the kube-apiserver with un-paginated LIST calls on high count resources.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
NA
Steps to Reproduce:
NA
Actual results:
Kube API Server and Openshift API Server in one of the cluster keeps restarting, without proper exception. The cluster is not accessible.
Expected results:
Kube API Server and Openshift API Server should be stable.
Additional info:
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-4960. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:
This is a follow up on OCPBUGSM-47202 (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2110570)
While OCPBUGSM-47202 fixes the issue specific for Set Pod Count, many other actions aren't fixed. When the user updates a Deployment with one of this options, and selects the action again, the old values are still shown.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable)
4.8-4.12 as well as master with the changes of OCPBUGSM-47202
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
Actual results:
Old data (labels, annotations, etc.) was shown.
Expected results:
Latest data should be shown
Additional info:
Description of problem:
Customer is facing issue similar to https://github.com/devfile/api/issues/897
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
OCP 4.10.17
How reproducible:
N/A
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
Actual results:
Expected results:
Additional info:
Tried working around it with ALL_PROXY but it did not help. Note because the console operator reverts changes pretty quickly testing this was a bit of a PITA
Description of problem:
Upgrade OCP 4.11 --> 4.12 fails with one 'NotReady,SchedulingDisabled' node and MachineConfigDaemonFailed.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Upgrade from OCP 4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-09-19-214532 on top of OSP RHOS-16.2-RHEL-8-20220804.n.1 to 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107. Network Type: OVNKubernetes
How reproducible:
Twice out of two attempts.
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install OCP 4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-09-19-214532 (IPI) on top of OSP RHOS-16.2-RHEL-8-20220804.n.1. The cluster is up and running with three workers: $ oc get clusterversion NAME VERSION AVAILABLE PROGRESSING SINCE STATUS version 4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-09-19-214532 True False 51m Cluster version is 4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-09-19-214532 2. Run the OC command to upgrade to 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107: $ oc adm upgrade --to-image=registry.ci.openshift.org/ocp/release:4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107 --allow-explicit-upgrade --force=true warning: Using by-tag pull specs is dangerous, and while we still allow it in combination with --force for backward compatibility, it would be much safer to pass a by-digest pull spec instead warning: The requested upgrade image is not one of the available updates.You have used --allow-explicit-upgrade for the update to proceed anyway warning: --force overrides cluster verification of your supplied release image and waives any update precondition failures. Requesting update to release image registry.ci.openshift.org/ocp/release:4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107 3. The upgrade is not succeeds: [0] $ oc get clusterversion NAME VERSION AVAILABLE PROGRESSING SINCE STATUS version 4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-09-19-214532 True True 17h Unable to apply 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107: wait has exceeded 40 minutes for these operators: network One node degrided to 'NotReady,SchedulingDisabled' status: $ oc get nodes NAME STATUS ROLES AGE VERSION ostest-9vllk-master-0 Ready master 19h v1.24.0+07c9eb7 ostest-9vllk-master-1 Ready master 19h v1.24.0+07c9eb7 ostest-9vllk-master-2 Ready master 19h v1.24.0+07c9eb7 ostest-9vllk-worker-0-4x4pt NotReady,SchedulingDisabled worker 18h v1.24.0+3882f8f ostest-9vllk-worker-0-h6kcs Ready worker 18h v1.24.0+3882f8f ostest-9vllk-worker-0-xhz9b Ready worker 18h v1.24.0+3882f8f $ oc get pods -A | grep -v -e Completed -e Running NAMESPACE NAME READY STATUS RESTARTS AGE openshift-openstack-infra coredns-ostest-9vllk-worker-0-4x4pt 0/2 Init:0/1 0 18h $ oc get events LAST SEEN TYPE REASON OBJECT MESSAGE 7m15s Warning OperatorDegraded: MachineConfigDaemonFailed /machine-config Unable to apply 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107: failed to apply machine config daemon manifests: error during waitForDaemonsetRollout: [timed out waiting for the condition, daemonset machine-config-daemon is not ready. status: (desired: 6, updated: 6, ready: 5, unavailable: 1)] 7m15s Warning MachineConfigDaemonFailed /machine-config Cluster not available for [{operator 4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-09-19-214532}]: failed to apply machine config daemon manifests: error during waitForDaemonsetRollout: [timed out waiting for the condition, daemonset machine-config-daemon is not ready. status: (desired: 6, updated: 6, ready: 5, unavailable: 1)] $ oc get co NAME VERSION AVAILABLE PROGRESSING DEGRADED SINCE MESSAGE authentication 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107 True False False 18h baremetal 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107 True False False 19h cloud-controller-manager 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107 True False False 19h cloud-credential 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107 True False False 19h cluster-autoscaler 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107 True False False 19h config-operator 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107 True False False 19h console 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107 True False False 18h control-plane-machine-set 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107 True False False 17h csi-snapshot-controller 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107 True False False 19h dns 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107 True True False 19h DNS "default" reports Progressing=True: "Have 5 available node-resolver pods, want 6." etcd 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107 True False False 19h image-registry 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107 True True False 18h Progressing: The registry is ready... ingress 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107 True False False 18h insights 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107 True False False 19h kube-apiserver 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107 True True False 18h NodeInstallerProgressing: 1 nodes are at revision 11; 2 nodes are at revision 13 kube-controller-manager 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107 True False False 19h kube-scheduler 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107 True False False 19h kube-storage-version-migrator 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107 True False False 19h machine-api 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107 True False False 19h machine-approver 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107 True False False 19h machine-config 4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-09-19-214532 False True True 16h Cluster not available for [{operator 4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-09-19-214532}]: failed to apply machine config daemon manifests: error during waitForDaemonsetRollout: [timed out waiting for the condition, daemonset machine-config-daemon is not ready. status: (desired: 6, updated: 6, ready: 5, unavailable: 1)] marketplace 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107 True False False 19h monitoring 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107 True False False 18h network 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107 True True True 19h DaemonSet "/openshift-ovn-kubernetes/ovnkube-node" rollout is not making progress - last change 2022-09-20T14:16:13Z... node-tuning 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107 True False False 17h openshift-apiserver 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107 True False False 18h openshift-controller-manager 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107 True False False 17h openshift-samples 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107 True False False 17h operator-lifecycle-manager 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107 True False False 19h operator-lifecycle-manager-catalog 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107 True False False 19h operator-lifecycle-manager-packageserver 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107 True False False 19h service-ca 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107 True False False 19h storage 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107 True True False 19h ManilaCSIDriverOperatorCRProgressing: ManilaDriverNodeServiceControllerProgressing: Waiting for DaemonSet to deploy node pods... [0] http://pastebin.test.redhat.com/1074531
Actual results:
OCP 4.11 --> 4.12 upgrade fails.
Expected results:
OCP 4.11 --> 4.12 upgrade success.
Additional info:
Attached logs of the NotReady node - [^journalctl_ostest-9vllk-worker-0-4x4pt.log.tar.gz]
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-3021. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:
me-west1 is not listed in the survey
Steps to Reproduce:
1. run survey (openshift-install create install-config without an install config file) 2. go through prompts until regions 3.
Actual results:
me-west1 region is missing
Expected results:
me-west1 region is listed (and install succeeds in the region)
This bug is a backport clone of [Bugzilla Bug 2089950](https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2089950). The following is the description of the original bug:
—
Description of problem: Some upgrades failed during scale testing with messages indicating the console operator is not available. In total 5 out of 2200 clusters failed with this pattern.
These clusters are all configured with the Console operator disabled in order to reduce overall OCP cpu use in the Telecom environment. The following CR is applied:
apiVersion: operator.openshift.io/v1
kind: Console
metadata:
annotations:
include.release.openshift.io/ibm-cloud-managed: "false"
include.release.openshift.io/self-managed-high-availability: "false"
include.release.openshift.io/single-node-developer: "false"
release.openshift.io/create-only: "true"
ran.openshift.io/ztp-deploy-wave: "10"
name: cluster
spec:
logLevel: Normal
managementState: Removed
operatorLogLevel: Normal
From one cluster (sno01175) the ClusterVersion conditions show:
' | jq
[
,
,
,
,
,
{ "lastTransitionTime": "2022-05-24T13:57:05Z", "message": "Cluster operator kube-apiserver should not be upgraded between minor versions: KubeletMinorVersionUpgradeable: Kubelet minor version (1.22.5+5c84e52) on node sno01175 will not be supported in the next OpenShift minor version upgrade.", "reason": "KubeletMinorVersion_KubeletMinorVersionUnsupportedNextUpgrade", "status": "False", "type": "Upgradeable" }]
Another cluster (sno01959) has very similar conditions with slight variation in the Failing and Progressing messages:
,
,
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 4.9.26 upgrade to 4.10.13
How reproducible: 5 out of 2200
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Disable console with managementState: Removed
2. Starting OCP version 4.9.26
3. Initiate upgrade to 4.10.13 via ClusterVersion CR
Actual results: Cluster upgrade is stuck (no longer progressing) for 5+ hours
Expected results: Cluster upgrade completes
Additional info:
Description of problem:
This is just a clone of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2105570 for purposes of cherry-picking.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.13
How reproducible:
Steps to Reproduce:
1. 2. 3.
Actual results:
Expected results:
Additional info:
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-1226. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
We added server groups for control plane and computes as part of OSASINFRA-2570, except for UPI that only creates server group for the control plane.
We need to update the UPI scripts to create server group for computes to be consistent with IPI and have the instruction at https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.11/machine_management/creating_machinesets/creating-machineset-osp.html work out of the box in case customers want to create MachineSets on their UPI clusters.
Related to OCPCLOUD-1135.
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-1629. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:
It is a disconnected cluster on AWS. There is an issue configuring Egress IP where the cluster uses STS. While looking into cloud-network-config-controller pod it is trying to connect to the global sts service "https://sts.amazonaws.com/" rather it should connect to the regional one "https://ec2.ap-southeast-1.amazonaws.com".
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Create a disconected OCP cluster on AWS.
$ oc get netnamespace | grep egress egress-ip-test 2689387 ["172.16.1.24"]
$ oc get hostsubnet NAME HOST HOST IP SUBNET EGRESS CIDRS EGRESS IPS ip-172-16-1-151.ap-southeast-1.compute.internal ip-172-16-1-151.ap-southeast-1.compute.internal 172.16.1.151 10.130.0.0/23 ip-172-16-1-53.ap-southeast-1.compute.internal ip-172-16-1-53.ap-southeast-1.compute.internal 172.16.1.53 10.131.0.0/23 ["172.16.1.24"] ip-172-16-2-15.ap-southeast-1.compute.internal ip-172-16-2-15.ap-southeast-1.compute.internal 172.16.2.15 10.128.0.0/23 ip-172-16-2-77.ap-southeast-1.compute.internal ip-172-16-2-77.ap-southeast-1.compute.internal 172.16.2.77 10.128.2.0/23 ip-172-16-3-111.ap-southeast-1.compute.internal ip-172-16-3-111.ap-southeast-1.compute.internal 172.16.3.111 10.129.0.0/23 ip-172-16-3-79.ap-southeast-1.compute.internal ip-172-16-3-79.ap-southeast-1.compute.internal 172.16.3.79 10.129.2.0/23
$ oc logs sdn-controller-6m5kb -n openshift-sdn I0922 04:09:53.348615 1 vnids.go:105] Allocated netid 2689387 for namespace "egress-ip-test" E0922 04:24:00.682018 1 egressip.go:254] Ignoring invalid HostSubnet ip-172-16-1-53.ap-southeast-1.compute.internal (host: "ip-172-16-1-53.ap-southeast-1.compute.internal", ip: "172.16.1.53", subnet: "10.131.0.0/23"): related node object "ip-172-16-1-53.ap-southeast-1.compute.internal" has an incomplete annotation "cloud.network.openshift.io/egress-ipconfig", CloudEgressIPConfig: <nil>
$ oc logs cloud-network-config-controller-5c7556db9f-x78bs -n openshift-cloud-network-config-controller E0922 04:26:59.468726 1 controller.go:165] error syncing 'ip-172-16-2-77.ap-southeast-1.compute.internal': error retrieving the private IP configuration for node: ip-172-16-2-77.ap-southeast-1.compute.internal, err: error: cannot list ec2 instance for node: ip-172-16-2-77.ap-southeast-1.compute.internal, err: WebIdentityErr: failed to retrieve credentials caused by: RequestError: send request failed caused by: Post "https://sts.amazonaws.com/": dial tcp 54.239.29.25:443: i/o timeout, requeuing in node workqueue
$ oc get Infrastructure -o yaml apiVersion: v1 items: - apiVersion: config.openshift.io/v1 kind: Infrastructure metadata: creationTimestamp: "2022-09-22T03:28:15Z" generation: 1 name: cluster resourceVersion: "598" uid: 994da301-2a96-43b7-b43b-4b7c18d4b716 spec: cloudConfig: name: "" platformSpec: aws: serviceEndpoints: - name: sts url: https://sts.ap-southeast-1.amazonaws.com - name: ec2 url: https://ec2.ap-southeast-1.amazonaws.com - name: elasticloadbalancing url: https://elasticloadbalancing.ap-southeast-1.amazonaws.com type: AWS status: apiServerInternalURI: https://api-int.openshiftyy.ocpaws.sadiqueonline.com:6443 apiServerURL: https://api.openshiftyy.ocpaws.sadiqueonline.com:6443 controlPlaneTopology: HighlyAvailable etcdDiscoveryDomain: "" infrastructureName: openshiftyy-wfrpf infrastructureTopology: HighlyAvailable platform: AWS platformStatus: aws: region: ap-southeast-1 serviceEndpoints: - name: ec2 url: https://ec2.ap-southeast-1.amazonaws.com - name: elasticloadbalancing url: https://elasticloadbalancing.ap-southeast-1.amazonaws.com - name: sts url: https://sts.ap-southeast-1.amazonaws.com type: AWS kind: List metadata: resourceVersion: ""
$ oc get secret aws-cloud-credentials -n openshift-machine-api -o json |jq -r .data.credentials |base64 -d [default] sts_regional_endpoints = regional role_arn = arn:aws:iam::015719942846:role/sputhenp-sts-yy-openshift-machine-api-aws-cloud-credentials web_identity_token_file = /var/run/secrets/openshift/serviceaccount/token [ec2-user@ip-172-17-1-229 ~]$ oc get secret cloud-credential-operator-iam-ro-creds -n openshift-cloud-credential-operator -o json |jq -r .data.credentials |base64 -d [default] sts_regional_endpoints = regional role_arn = arn:aws:iam::015719942846:role/sputhenp-sts-yy-openshift-cloud-credential-operator-cloud-creden web_identity_token_file = /var/run/secrets/openshift/serviceaccount/token [ec2-user@ip-172-17-1-229 ~]$ oc get secret installer-cloud-credentials -n openshift-image-registry -o json |jq -r .data.credentials |base64 -d [default] sts_regional_endpoints = regional role_arn = arn:aws:iam::015719942846:role/sputhenp-sts-yy-openshift-image-registry-installer-cloud-credent web_identity_token_file = /var/run/secrets/openshift/serviceaccount/token [ec2-user@ip-172-17-1-229 ~]$ oc get secret cloud-credentials -n openshift-ingress-operator -o json |jq -r .data.credentials |base64 -d [default] sts_regional_endpoints = regional role_arn = arn:aws:iam::015719942846:role/sputhenp-sts-yy-openshift-ingress-operator-cloud-credentials web_identity_token_file = /var/run/secrets/openshift/serviceaccount/token [ec2-user@ip-172-17-1-229 ~]$ oc get secret cloud-credentials -n openshift-cloud-network-config-controller -o json |jq -r .data.credentials |base64 -d [default] sts_regional_endpoints = regional role_arn = arn:aws:iam::015719942846:role/sputhenp-sts-yy-openshift-cloud-network-config-controller-cloud- web_identity_token_file = /var/run/secrets/openshift/serviceaccount/token [ec2-user@ip-172-17-1-229 ~]$ oc get secret ebs-cloud-credentials -n openshift-cluster-csi-drivers -o json |jq -r .data.credentials |base64 -d [default] sts_regional_endpoints = regional role_arn = arn:aws:iam::015719942846:role/sputhenp-sts-yy-openshift-cluster-csi-drivers-ebs-cloud-credenti web_identity_token_file = /var/run/secrets/openshift/serviceaccount/token
Actual results:
Egress IP not configured properly and cloud-network-config-controller trying to connect to global STS service.
Expected results:
Egress IP should get configured and cloud-network-config-controller should connect to regional STS service instead of global.
Additional info:
Description of problem:
Setting disableNetworkDiagnostics: true does not persist when network-operator pod gets re-created.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.11.0-rc.0
How reproducible:
100%
Steps to Reproduce:
1. $ oc patch network.operator.openshift.io/cluster --patch '{"spec":{"disableNetworkDiagnostics":true}}' --type=merge
network.operator.openshift.io/cluster patched
2. $ oc -n openshift-network-operator delete pods network-operator-9b68954c6-bclx6
pod "network-operator-9b68954c6-bclx6" deleted
3. $ oc get network.operator.openshift.io cluster -o json | jq .spec.disableNetworkDiagnostics
false
Actual results:
disableNetworkDiagnostics set to false, not set to true as configured in step 1
Expected results:
disableNetworkDiagnostics set to true
Additional info:
Attaching must-gather.
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-2181. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:
E2E test Installs Red Hat Integration - 3scale operator test is failing due to change of Operator name
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-3117. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-3084. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Upstream Issue: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/77603
Long log lines get corrupted when using '--timestamps' by the Kubelet.
The root cause is that the buffer reads up to a new line. If the line is greater than 4096 bytes and '--timestamps' is turrned on the kubelet will write the timestamp and the partial log line. We will need to refactor the ReadLogs function to allow for a partial line read.
apiVersion: v1
kind: Pod
metadata:
name: logs
spec:
restartPolicy: Never
containers:
- name: logs
image: fedora
args:
- bash
- -c
- 'for i in `seq 1 10000000`; do echo -n $i; done'
kubectl logs logs --timestamps
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-3114. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:
When running a Hosted Cluster on Hypershift the cluster-networking-operator never progressed to Available despite all the components being up and running
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
quay.io/openshift-release-dev/ocp-release:4.11.11-x86_64 for the hosted clusters hypershift operator is quay.io/hypershift/hypershift-operator:4.11 4.11.9 management cluster
How reproducible:
Happened once
Steps to Reproduce:
1. 2. 3.
Actual results:
oc get co network reports False availability
Expected results:
oc get co network reports True availability
Additional info:
Description of problem: Issue described in following issue: https://github.com/openshift/multus-admission-controller/issues/40
Fixed in: https://github.com/openshift/cluster-network-operator/pull/1515
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): OCP 4.10
Official Red Hat tracker. Issue has been merged already.
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-6671. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-3228. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
While starting a Pipelinerun using UI, and in the process of providing the values on "Start Pipeline" , the IBM Power Customer (Deepak Shetty from IBM) has tried creating credentials under "Advanced options" with "Image Registry Credentials" (Authenticaion type). When the IBM Customer verified the credentials from Secrets tab (in Workloads) , the secret was found in broken state. Screenshot of the broken secret is attached.
The issue has been observed on OCP4.8, OCP4.9 and OCP4.10.
Description of problem:
AWS tagging - when applying user defined tags you cannot add more than 10
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
Steps to Reproduce:
1. 2. 3.
Actual results:
Expected results:
Additional info:
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-858. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:
In OCP 4.9, the package-server-manager was introduced to manage the packageserver CSV. However, when OCP 4.8 in upgraded to 4.9, the packageserver stays stuck in v0.17.0, which is the version in OCP 4.8, and v0.18.3 does not roll out, which is the version in OCP 4.9
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install OCP 4.8 2. Upgrade to OCP 4.9 $ oc get clusterversion NAME VERSION AVAILABLE PROGRESSING SINCE STATUS version 4.8.0-0.nightly-2022-08-31-160214 True True 50m Working towards 4.9.47: 619 of 738 done (83% complete) $ oc get clusterversion NAME VERSION AVAILABLE PROGRESSING SINCE STATUS version 4.9.47 True False 4m26s Cluster version is 4.9.47
Actual results:
Check packageserver CSV. It's in v0.17.0 $ oc get csv NAME DISPLAY VERSION REPLACES PHASE packageserver Package Server 0.17.0 Succeeded
Expected results:
packageserver CSV is at 0.18.3
Additional info:
packageserver CSV version in 4.8: https://github.com/openshift/operator-framework-olm/blob/release-4.8/manifests/0000_50_olm_15-packageserver.clusterserviceversion.yaml#L12 packageserver CSV version in 4.9: https://github.com/openshift/operator-framework-olm/blob/release-4.9/pkg/manifests/csv.yaml#L8
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-1765. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:
If a customer creates a machine with a networks section like this networks: - filter: {} noAllowedAddressPairs: false subnets: - filter: {} uuid: primary-subnet-uuid - filter: {} noAllowedAddressPairs: true subnets: - filter: {} uuid: other-subnet-uuid primarySubnet: primary-subnet-uuid Then all the ports are created without the allowed address pairs. Doing some research in the source code, I have found that: - For each entry on the networks: section, networks are filtered as per its filter: section[1] - Then, if the subnets: section of the network entry is not empty, for each of the network IDs found above[2], 2 things are done that are relevant for this situatoin: - The net ID is saved on a netsWithoutAllowedAddressPairs[3]. That map is later checked while creating any port[4]. - For each subnet entry that matches the network ID, a port is created[5]. So, the problematic behavior happens due to the following: - Both entries in the networks array have empty filters. This means that both entries selected all the neutron networks. - This configuration results in one port per subnet as expected because, in the later traversal of the subnets array of each entry[5], it is filtering by subnet and creating a single port as expected. - However, the entry with "noAllowedAddressPairs: true" is selecting all the neutron networks, so it adds all of them to the netsWithoutAllowedAddressPairs map[3], regardless of the subnets filtering. - As all the networks are in noAllowedAddressPairs: true array, all the ports created for the VM have their allowed address pairs removed[4]. Why do we consider this behavior undesired? I understand that, if we create a port for a network that has no allowed pairs, we create all the other ports in the same networks without the pairs. However, it is surprising that a port in a network is removed the allowed address pairs due to a setting in an entry that yielded no port on that network. In other words, one would expect that the same subnet filtering that happens on each network entry in what regards yielding ports for the VM would also work for the noAllowedPairs parameter.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.10.30
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Create a machineset like in the description 2. 3.
Actual results:
All ports have no address pairs
Expected results:
Only the port on the secondary subnet has no address pairs.
Additional info:
A simple workaround would be to just fill the filter so that a single network is selected for each network entry. References: [1] - https://github.com/openshift/cluster-api-provider-openstack/blob/f6b51710d4f395ded401347589447f5f41dd5c4c/pkg/cloud/openstack/clients/machineservice.go#L576 [2] - https://github.com/openshift/cluster-api-provider-openstack/blob/f6b51710d4f395ded401347589447f5f41dd5c4c/pkg/cloud/openstack/clients/machineservice.go#L580 [3] - https://github.com/openshift/cluster-api-provider-openstack/blob/f6b51710d4f395ded401347589447f5f41dd5c4c/pkg/cloud/openstack/clients/machineservice.go#L581-L583 [4] - https://github.com/openshift/cluster-api-provider-openstack/blob/f6b51710d4f395ded401347589447f5f41dd5c4c/pkg/cloud/openstack/clients/machineservice.go#L658-L660 [5] - https://github.com/openshift/cluster-api-provider-openstack/blob/f6b51710d4f395ded401347589447f5f41dd5c4c/pkg/cloud/openstack/clients/machineservice.go#L610-L625
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-5067. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:
Since coreos-installer writes to stdout, its logs are not available for us.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
Steps to Reproduce:
1. 2. 3.
Actual results:
Expected results:
Additional info:
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-2495. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Failures like:
$ oc login --token=... Logged into "https://api..." as "..." using the token provided. Error from server (Timeout): the server was unable to return a response in the time allotted, but may still be processing the request (get projects.project.openshift.io)
break login, which tries to gather information before saving the configuration, including a giant project list.
Ideally login would be able to save the successful login credentials, even when the informative gathering had difficulties. And possibly the informative gathering could be made conditional (--quiet or similar?) so expensive gathering could be skipped in use-cases where the context was not needed.
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-262. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
github rate limit failures for upi image downloading govc.
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-3889. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-3744. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:
Egress router POD creation on Openshift 4.11 is failing with below error. ~~~ Nov 15 21:51:29 pltocpwn03 hyperkube[3237]: E1115 21:51:29.467436 3237 pod_workers.go:951] "Error syncing pod, skipping" err="failed to \"CreatePodSandbox\" for \"stage-wfe-proxy-ext-qrhjw_stage-wfe-proxy(c965a287-28aa-47b6-9e79-0cc0e209fcf2)\" with CreatePodSandboxError: \"Failed to create sandbox for pod \\\"stage-wfe-proxy-ext-qrhjw_stage-wfe-proxy(c965a287-28aa-47b6-9e79-0cc0e209fcf2)\\\": rpc error: code = Unknown desc = failed to create pod network sandbox k8s_stage-wfe-proxy-ext-qrhjw_stage-wfe-proxy_c965a287-28aa-47b6-9e79-0cc0e209fcf2_0(72bcf9e52b199061d6e651e84b0892efc142601b2442c2d00b92a1ba23208344): error adding pod stage-wfe-proxy_stage-wfe-proxy-ext-qrhjw to CNI network \\\"multus-cni-network\\\": plugin type=\\\"multus\\\" name=\\\"multus-cni-network\\\" failed (add): [stage-wfe-proxy/stage-wfe-proxy-ext-qrhjw/c965a287-28aa-47b6-9e79-0cc0e209fcf2:openshift-sdn]: error adding container to network \\\"openshift-sdn\\\": CNI request failed with status 400: 'could not open netns \\\"/var/run/netns/8c5ca402-3381-4935-baed-ea454161d669\\\": unknown FS magic on \\\"/var/run/netns/8c5ca402-3381-4935-baed-ea454161d669\\\": 1021994\\n'\"" pod="stage-wfe-proxy/stage-wfe-proxy-ext-qrhjw" podUID=c965a287-28aa-47b6-9e79-0cc0e209fcf2 ~~~ I have checked SDN POD log from node where egress router POD is failing and I could see below error message. ~~~ 2022-11-15T21:51:29.283002590Z W1115 21:51:29.282954 181720 pod.go:296] CNI_ADD stage-wfe-proxy/stage-wfe-proxy-ext-qrhjw failed: could not open netns "/var/run/netns/8c5ca402-3381-4935-baed-ea454161d669": unknown FS magic on "/var/run/netns/8c5ca402-3381-4935-baed-ea454161d669": 1021994 ~~~ Crio is logging below event and looking at the log it seems the namespace has been created on node. ~~~ Nov 15 21:51:29 pltocpwn03 crio[3150]: time="2022-11-15 21:51:29.307184956Z" level=info msg="Got pod network &{Name:stage-wfe-proxy-ext-qrhjw Namespace:stage-wfe-proxy ID:72bcf9e52b199061d6e651e84b0892efc142601b2442c2d00b92a1ba23208344 UID:c965a287-28aa-47b6-9e79-0cc0e209fcf2 NetNS:/var/run/netns/8c5ca402-3381-4935-baed-ea454161d669 Networks:[] RuntimeConfig:map[multus-cni-network:{IP: MAC: PortMappings:[] Bandwidth:<nil> IpRanges:[]}] Aliases:map[]}" ~~~
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.11.12
How reproducible:
Not Sure
Steps to Reproduce:
1. 2. 3.
Actual results:
Egress router POD is failing to create. Sample application could be created without any issue.
Expected results:
Egress router POD should get created
Additional info:
Egress router POD is created following below document and it does contain pod.network.openshift.io/assign-macvlan: "true" annotation. https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.11/networking/openshift_sdn/deploying-egress-router-layer3-redirection.html#nw-egress-router-pod_deploying-egress-router-layer3-redirection
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-884. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:
Since the decomissioning of the psi cluster, and subsequent move of the rhcos release browser, product builds machine-os-images builds have been failing. See e.g. https://brewweb.engineering.redhat.com/brew/taskinfo?taskID=47565717
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.12, 4.11, 4.10.
How reproducible:
Have ART build the image
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Have ART build the image
Actual results:
Build failure
Expected results:
Build succesful
Additional info:
Node healthz server was added in 4.13 with https://github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/commit/c8489e3ff9c321e77f265dc9d484ed2549df4a6b and https://github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/commit/9a836e3a547f3464d433ce8b9eef336624d51858. We need to configure it by default on 0.0.0.0:10256 on CNO for ovnk, just like we do for sdn.
Description of problem:
When creating a ProjectHelmChartRepository (with or without the form) and setting a display name (as `spec.name`), this value is not used in the developer catalog / Helm Charts catalog filter sidebar.
It shows (and watches) the display names of `HelmChartRepository` resources.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.11
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Switch to Developer Perspective 2. Navigate to Add > "Helm Chart repositories" 3. Enter "ibm-charts" as "Chart repository name" 4. Enter URL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/IBM/charts/master/repo/community/index.yaml as URL) 5. Press on create 6. Open the YAML editor and change the `spec.name` attribute to "IBM Charts" 7. Save the change 8. Navigate to Add > "Helm Chart"
Actual results:
The filter navigation on the left side shows "Chart Repositories" "Ibm Chart". A camel case version of the resource name.
Expected results:
It should show the "spec.name" "IBM Charts" if defined and fallback to the current implementation if the optional spec.name is not defined.
Additional info:
There is a bug discussing that the display name could not be entered directly, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2106366. This bug here is only about the catalog output.
Description of problem: defined in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2051533
When adding remote worker node using ZTP the agent finishes the installation and is marked as done. oc get agent -o wide NAME CLUSTER APPROVED ROLE STAGE HOSTNAME REQUESTED HOSTNAME 0277804e-2a7c-4d95-9d0f-e22a190d582a spoke-0 true worker Done spoke-worker-0-0.spoke-0.qe.lab.redhat.com spoke-worker-0-0 12efa520-5b99-4474-805d-931e46ad43f7 spoke-0 true master Done spoke-master-0-2.spoke-0.qe.lab.redhat.com spoke-master-0-2 3b8eec89-f26f-4896-8f71-8a810894c560 spoke-0 true master Done spoke-master-0-0.spoke-0.qe.lab.redhat.com spoke-master-0-0 3fb3749e-c132-4258-ad1a-08a0445c9022 spoke-0 true worker Done spoke-worker-0-1.spoke-0.qe.lab.redhat.com spoke-worker-0-1 728559e9-5543-41d9-adb0-e58196f765af spoke-0 true master Done spoke-master-0-1.spoke-0.qe.lab.redhat.com spoke-master-0-1 982e1ff6-6e83-4800-b061-8cdfd0b844fb spoke-0 true worker Done spoke-rwn-0-1.spoke-rwn-0.qe.lab.redhat.com spoke-rwn-0-1 a76eaa6a-b351-429f-bfa1-e53a70503573 spoke-0 true worker Done spoke-rwn-0-0.spoke-rwn-0.qe.lab.redhat.com spoke-rwn-0-0 Logging into the spoke cluster the bmh and machine resources are created and the node resource is not: oc get bmh -n openshift-machine-api NAME STATE CONSUMER ONLINE ERROR AGE spoke-master-0-0 unmanaged spoke-0-pxbfh-master-0 true 3h32m spoke-master-0-1 unmanaged spoke-0-pxbfh-master-1 true 3h32m spoke-master-0-2 unmanaged spoke-0-pxbfh-master-2 true 3h32m spoke-rwn-0-0-bmh externally provisioned spoke-0-spoke-rwn-0-0-bmh true provisioned registration error 168m spoke-rwn-0-1-bmh externally provisioned spoke-0-spoke-rwn-0-1-bmh true provisioned registration error 168m spoke-worker-0-0 unmanaged spoke-0-pxbfh-worker-0-65mrb true 3h32m spoke-worker-0-1 unmanaged spoke-0-pxbfh-worker-0-nnmcq true 3h32m oc get machine -n openshift-machine-api NAME PHASE TYPE REGION ZONE AGE spoke-0-pxbfh-master-0 Running 3h33m spoke-0-pxbfh-master-1 Running 3h33m spoke-0-pxbfh-master-2 Running 3h33m spoke-0-pxbfh-worker-0-65mrb Running 3h19m spoke-0-pxbfh-worker-0-nnmcq Running 3h20m spoke-0-spoke-rwn-0-0-bmh Provisioned 169m spoke-0-spoke-rwn-0-1-bmh Provisioned 169m Note: bmh is in error state: Normal ProvisionedRegistrationError 30m metal3-baremetal-controller Host adoption failed: Error while attempting to adopt node 529b3e75-5d04-4486-9296-269081d0ec02: Error validating Redfish virtual media. Some parameters were missing in node's driver_info. Missing are: ['deploy_kernel', 'deploy_ramdisk']. oc get nodes NAME STATUS ROLES AGE VERSION spoke-master-0-0.spoke-0.qe.lab.redhat.com Ready master 72m v1.22.3+2cb6068 spoke-master-0-1.spoke-0.qe.lab.redhat.com Ready master 50m v1.22.3+2cb6068 spoke-master-0-2.spoke-0.qe.lab.redhat.com Ready master 72m v1.22.3+2cb6068 spoke-worker-0-0.spoke-0.qe.lab.redhat.com Ready worker 51m v1.22.3+2cb6068 spoke-worker-0-1.spoke-0.qe.lab.redhat.com Ready worker 51m v1.22.3+2cb6068 node-bootstrapper CSR is created but not auto-approved; periodically another node-strapper csr is created until it is manually approved: oc get csr | grep Pending csr-5ll2g 9m9s kubernetes.io/kube-apiserver-client-kubelet system:serviceaccount:openshift-machine-config-operator:node-bootstrapper <none> Pending csr-f8vbl 8m24s kubernetes.io/kube-apiserver-client-kubelet system:serviceaccount:openshift-machine-config-operator:node-bootstrapper <none> Pending
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
assisted-service master at revision af0bafb3f7f629932f8c3dc31ccddedfe6984926 ocp version: 4.10.0-rc.1
How reproducible:
1. Install remote worker node using ztp 2. Wait for node resource to be created
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install remote worker node using ztp 2. Wait for node resource to be created
Actual results:
node-bootstrapper and node CSR are not auto-approved and node resource is not created. The bmh resource remains in registration error
Expected results:
node-bootstrapper and node CSR should be auto-approved and node resource created. The bmh resource should not be in registration error
Additional info:
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-4311. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-4305. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:
Please add an option to DISABLE debug in ironic-api. Presently it is enabled by default and there is no way to disable it or reduce log level
https://github.com/metal3-io/ironic-image/blob/main/ironic-config/ironic.conf.j2#L3
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): none
How reproducible: Every time
Steps to Reproduce:
Please check source code here: https://github.com/metal3-io/ironic-image/blob/main/ironic-config/ironic.conf.j2#L3
It is enabled by default and there is no way to disable it or reduce log level
Actual results:
Please check Case: 03371411, the log file grew to 409 GB
Expected results: Need a way to disable debug
Additional info: Case 03371411. A cluster must gather and log file can be found in the case.
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-675. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:
A cluster hit a panic in etcd operator in bootstrap:
I0829 14:46:02.736582 1 controller_manager.go:54] StaticPodStateController controller terminated
panic: runtime error: invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference
[signal SIGSEGV: segmentation violation code=0x1 addr=0x0 pc=0x1e940ab]
goroutine 2701 [running]:
github.com/openshift/cluster-etcd-operator/pkg/etcdcli.checkSingleMemberHealth({0x29374c0, 0xc00217d920}, 0xc0021fb110)
github.com/openshift/cluster-etcd-operator/pkg/etcdcli/health.go:135 +0x34b
github.com/openshift/cluster-etcd-operator/pkg/etcdcli.getMemberHealth.func1()
github.com/openshift/cluster-etcd-operator/pkg/etcdcli/health.go:58 +0x7f
created by github.com/openshift/cluster-etcd-operator/pkg/etcdcli.getMemberHealth
github.com/openshift/cluster-etcd-operator/pkg/etcdcli/health.go:54 +0x2ac
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
Pulled up a 4.12 cluster and hit panic during bootstrap
Steps to Reproduce:
1. 2. 3.
Actual results:
panic as above
Expected results:
no panic
Additional info:
Description of problem:
Disconnected IPI OCP 4.10.22 cluster install on baremetal fails when hostname of master nodes does not include "master"
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 4.10.22
How reproducible: Perform disconnected IPI install of OCP 4.10.22 on bare metal with master nodes that do not contain the text "master"
Steps to Reproduce:
Perform disconnected IPI install of OCP 4.10.22 on bare metal with master nodes that do not contain the text "master"
Actual results: master nodes do come up.
Expected results: master nodes should come up despite that the text "master" is not in their hostname.
Additional info:
Disconnected IPI OCP 4.10.22 cluster install on baremetal fails when hostname of master nodes does not include "master"
The code for the cluster-baremetal-operator at the following link:
The following condition is concerning:
if strings.Contains(bmh.Name, "master") && len(bmh.Spec.BootMACAddress) > 0
The packages reveal that bmh.Name references the name inside the metadata of the BMH object.
Should a customer have masters with names that do not include the text "master", the above condition can never become true, and so, the following slice is never created :
macs = append(macs, bmh.Spec.BootMACAddress)
In order to delete the correct GCP cloud resources, the "--credentials-requests-dir" parameter must be passed to "ccoctl gcp delete". This was fixed for 4.12 as part of https://github.com/openshift/cloud-credential-operator/pull/489 but must be backported for previous releases. See https://github.com/openshift/cloud-credential-operator/pull/489#issuecomment-1248733205 for discussion regarding this bug.
To reproduce, create GCP infrastructure with a name parameter that is a subset of another set of GCP infrastructure's name parameter. I will "ccoctl gcp create all" with "name=abutcher-gcp" and "name=abutcher-gcp1".
$ ./ccoctl gcp create-all \ --name=abutcher-gcp \ --region=us-central1 \ --project=openshift-hive-dev \ --credentials-requests-dir=./credrequests $ ./ccoctl gcp create-all \ --name=abutcher-gcp1 \ --region=us-central1 \ --project=openshift-hive-dev \ --credentials-requests-dir=./credrequests
Running "ccoctl gcp delete --name=abutcher-gcp" will result in GCP infrastructure for both "abutcher-gcp" and "abutcher-gcp1" being deleted.
$ ./ccoctl gcp delete --name abutcher-gcp --project openshift-hive-dev 2022/10/24 11:30:06 Credentials loaded from file "/home/abutcher/.gcp/osServiceAccount.json" 2022/10/24 11:30:06 Deleted object .well-known/openid-configuration from bucket abutcher-gcp-oidc 2022/10/24 11:30:07 Deleted object keys.json from bucket abutcher-gcp-oidc 2022/10/24 11:30:07 OIDC bucket abutcher-gcp-oidc deleted 2022/10/24 11:30:09 IAM Service account abutcher-gcp-openshift-image-registry-gcs deleted 2022/10/24 11:30:10 IAM Service account abutcher-gcp-openshift-gcp-ccm deleted 2022/10/24 11:30:11 IAM Service account abutcher-gcp1-openshift-cloud-network-config-controller-gcp deleted 2022/10/24 11:30:12 IAM Service account abutcher-gcp-openshift-machine-api-gcp deleted 2022/10/24 11:30:13 IAM Service account abutcher-gcp-openshift-ingress-gcp deleted 2022/10/24 11:30:15 IAM Service account abutcher-gcp-openshift-gcp-pd-csi-driver-operator deleted 2022/10/24 11:30:16 IAM Service account abutcher-gcp1-openshift-ingress-gcp deleted 2022/10/24 11:30:17 IAM Service account abutcher-gcp1-openshift-image-registry-gcs deleted 2022/10/24 11:30:19 IAM Service account abutcher-gcp-cloud-credential-operator-gcp-ro-creds deleted 2022/10/24 11:30:20 IAM Service account abutcher-gcp1-openshift-gcp-pd-csi-driver-operator deleted 2022/10/24 11:30:21 IAM Service account abutcher-gcp1-openshift-gcp-ccm deleted 2022/10/24 11:30:22 IAM Service account abutcher-gcp1-cloud-credential-operator-gcp-ro-creds deleted 2022/10/24 11:30:24 IAM Service account abutcher-gcp1-openshift-machine-api-gcp deleted 2022/10/24 11:30:25 IAM Service account abutcher-gcp-openshift-cloud-network-config-controller-gcp deleted 2022/10/24 11:30:25 Workload identity pool abutcher-gcp deleted
Changelog between 3.5.5 and 3.5.4:
https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd/blob/main/CHANGELOG/CHANGELOG-3.5.md#v355-tbd
Changelog between 3.5.3 and 3.5.4:
https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd/blob/main/CHANGELOG/CHANGELOG-3.5.md#v354-2022-04-24
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-4238. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-3883. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
While doing a PerfScale test of we noticed that the ovnkube pods are not being spread out evenly among the available workers. Instead they are all stacking on a few until they fill up the available allocatable ebs volumes (25 in the case of m5 instances that we see here).
An example from partway through our 80 hosted cluster test when there were ~30 hosted clusters created/in progress
There are 24 workers available:
```
$ for i in `oc get nodes l node-role.kubernetes.io/worker=,node-role.kubernetes.io/infra!=,node-role.kubernetes.io/workload!= | egrep -v "NAME" | awk '{ print $1 }'`; do echo $i `oc describe node $i | grep -v openshift | grep ovnkube -c`; done
ip-10-0-129-227.us-west-2.compute.internal 0
ip-10-0-136-22.us-west-2.compute.internal 25
ip-10-0-136-29.us-west-2.compute.internal 0
ip-10-0-147-248.us-west-2.compute.internal 0
ip-10-0-150-147.us-west-2.compute.internal 0
ip-10-0-154-207.us-west-2.compute.internal 0
ip-10-0-156-0.us-west-2.compute.internal 0
ip-10-0-157-1.us-west-2.compute.internal 4
ip-10-0-160-253.us-west-2.compute.internal 0
ip-10-0-161-30.us-west-2.compute.internal 0
ip-10-0-164-98.us-west-2.compute.internal 0
ip-10-0-168-245.us-west-2.compute.internal 0
ip-10-0-170-103.us-west-2.compute.internal 0
ip-10-0-188-169.us-west-2.compute.internal 25
ip-10-0-188-194.us-west-2.compute.internal 0
ip-10-0-191-51.us-west-2.compute.internal 5
ip-10-0-192-10.us-west-2.compute.internal 0
ip-10-0-193-200.us-west-2.compute.internal 0
ip-10-0-193-27.us-west-2.compute.internal 7
ip-10-0-199-1.us-west-2.compute.internal 0
ip-10-0-203-161.us-west-2.compute.internal 0
ip-10-0-204-40.us-west-2.compute.internal 23
ip-10-0-220-164.us-west-2.compute.internal 0
ip-10-0-222-59.us-west-2.compute.internal 0
```
This is running quay.io/openshift-release-dev/ocp-release:4.11.11-x86_64 for the hosted clusters and the hypershift operator is quay.io/hypershift/hypershift-operator:4.11 on a 4.11.9 management cluster
Description of problem:
When the user installs a helm chart, the dropdown to select a specific version is always disabled. Also for helm charts that can upgraded or downgraded after installation. For example the nodejs helm chart.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
At least 4.11, maybe all versions, but a backport to 4.11 is fine
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Switch to developer perspective 2. Navigate to Add > Helm chart 3. Select the Nodejs helm chart 4. Try to select another version .. When the user installs the not selectable version and edit the helm chart there is another version to selec
Actual results:
The version is not selectable.
Expected results:
The version should be selectable.
Additional info:
This bug represents a backport of CCO-222 to release-4.11.
Description of problem:
We observed that a dual stack cluster deployed with AI gui only fails. This cluster is dhcp for ipv4, RA/RS autoconfiguration for ipv6. It fails with error in the onvkube container ``` I0906 07:45:43.044090 87450 gateway_init.go:261] Initializing Gateway Functionality I0906 07:45:43.046398 87450 gateway_localnet.go:152] Node local addresses initialized to: map[10.131.31.214:{10.131.31.208 fffffff0} 10.255.0.2:{10.255.0.0 fffffe00} 127.0.0.1:{127.0.0.0 ff000000} 2001:1b74:480:613a:f6e9:d4ff:fef1:6f26:{2001:1b74:480:613a:: ffffffffffffffff0000000000000000} ::1:{::1 ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff} fd01:0:0:1::2:{fd01:0:0:1:: ffffffffffffffff0000000000000000} fe80::8ce9:b4ff:fe1a:1208:{fe80:: ffffffffffffffff0000000000000000} fe80::c8ef:ecff:fee3:64c7:{fe80:: ffffffffffffffff0000000000000000} fe80::f6e9:d4ff:fef1:6f26:{fe80:: ffffffffffffffff0000000000000000}] I0906 07:45:43.047759 87450 helper_linux.go:71] Provided gateway interface "br-ex", found as index: 7 I0906 07:45:43.048045 87450 helper_linux.go:97] Found default gateway interface br-ex 10.131.31.209 I0906 07:45:43.048152 87450 helper_linux.go:71] Provided gateway interface "br-ex", found as index: 7 F0906 07:45:43.048318 87450 ovnkube.go:133] failed to get default gateway interface ``` on the node we observed that there is multi-path entry during ``` default proto ra metric 48 pref medium nexthop via fe80::e2f6:2d01:ab14:ec71 dev br-ex weight 1 nexthop via fe80::e2f6:2d01:ab11:c271 dev br-ex weight 1 ``` I manually remove one of the entries (`ip route delete`) and then delete the ovnkube-node pod. Then the installation continues, container works. Every time there is multiple entry, if the onvkube-node starts, it fails.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.10.30
How reproducible:
Steps to Reproduce:
1. 2. 3.
Actual results:
Expected results:
Additional info:
There might a side issue: the interface of the node upon boot takes time to get the ipv6 autoconfiguration, no RS packets seemed to be sent out (observed zero on all routers).
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-6816. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-6799. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:
The pipelines -> repositories list view in Dev Console does not show the running pipelineline as the last pipelinerun in the table.
Original BugZilla Link: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2016006
OCPBUGSM: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGSM-36408
During initial backporting, due to a number of other colliding commits in upstream, the cobra commands facilitating caching did not get downstreamed.
This is to downstream those two lines.
Description of problem:
If you set a services cluster IP to an IP with a leading zero (e.g. 192.168.0.011), ovn-k should normalise this and remove the leading zero before sending it to ovn.
This was seen by me on a CI run executing the k8 test here: test/e2e/network/funny_ips.go +75
you can reproduce using that above test.
Have a read of the text there:
43 // What are funny IPs: 44 // The adjective is because of the curl blog that explains the history and the problem of liberal 45 // parsing of IP addresses and the consequences and security risks caused the lack of normalization, 46 // mainly due to the use of different notations to abuse parsers misalignment to bypass filters. 47 // xref: https://daniel.haxx.se/blog/2021/04/19/curl-those-funny-ipv4-addresses/ 48 // 49 // Since golang 1.17, IPv4 addresses with leading zeros are rejected by the standard library. 50 // xref: https://github.com/golang/go/issues/30999 51 // 52 // Because this change on the parsers can cause that previous valid data become invalid, Kubernetes 53 // forked the old parsers allowing leading zeros on IPv4 address to not break the compatibility. 54 // 55 // Kubernetes interprets leading zeros on IPv4 addresses as decimal, users must not rely on parser 56 // alignment to not being impacted by the associated security advisory: CVE-2021-29923 golang 57 // standard library "net" - Improper Input Validation of octal literals in golang 1.16.2 and below 58 // standard library "net" results in indeterminate SSRF & RFI vulnerabilities. xref: 59 // https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-29923
northd is logging an error about this also:
|socket_util|ERR|172.30.0.011:7180: bad IP address "172.30.0.011" ... 2022-08-23T14:14:21.968Z|01839|ovn_util|WARN|bad ip address or port for load balancer key 172.30.0.011:7180
Also, I see the error:
E0823 14:14:34.135115 3284 gateway_shared_intf.go:600] Failed to delete conntrack entry for service e2e-funny-ips-8626/funny-ip: failed to delete conntrack entry for service e2e-funny-ips-8626/funny-ip with svcVIP 172.30.0.011, svcPort 7180, protocol TCP: value "<nil>" passed to DeleteConntrack is not an IP address
We should normalise the IPs before sending to OVN-k. I see also theres conntrack error when trying to set this bad IP.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
Steps to Reproduce:
1. See above k8 test
Actual results:
Leading zero IP sent to OVN
Expected results:
No leading zero IP sent to OVN
Additional info:
update ironic software to pick up latest bug fixes
update dependencies as needed
this is also related to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2115122
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-6018. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
This is a public clone of OCPBUGS-3821
The MCO can sometimes render a rendered-config in the middle of an upgrade with old MCs, e.g.:
This will cause the render controller to create a new rendered MC that uses the OLD kubeletconfig-MC, which at best is a double reboot for 1 node, and at worst block the update and break maxUnavailable nodes per pool.
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-1130. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
The test results in sippy look really bad on our less common platforms, but still pretty unacceptable even on core clouds. It's reasonably often the only test that fails. We need to decide what to do here, and we're going to need input from the etcd team.
As of Sep 13th:
Even on some major variant combos, a 4-8% failure rate is too high.
On Sep 13 arch call (no etcd present), Damien mentioned this might be an upstream alert that just isn't well suited for OpenShift's use cases, is this the case and it needs tuning?
Has the problem been getting worse?
I believe this link https://datastudio.google.com/s/urkKwmmzvgo indicates that this may be the case for 4.12, AWS and Azure are both getting worse in ways that I don't see if we change the release to 4.11 where it looks consistent. gcp seems fine on 4.12. We do not have data for vsphere for some reason.
This link shows the grpc_methods most commonly involved: https://search.ci.openshift.org/?search=etcdGRPCRequestsSlow+was+at+or+above&maxAge=48h&context=7&type=junit&name=&excludeName=&maxMatches=5&maxBytes=20971520&groupBy=job
At a glance: LeaseGrant, MemberList, Txn, Status, Range.
Broken out of TRT-401
For linking with sippy:
[bz-etcd][invariant] alert/etcdGRPCRequestsSlow should not be at or above info
[sig-arch][bz-etcd][Late] Alerts alert/etcdGRPCRequestsSlow should not be at or above info [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel]
Description of problem:
The alertmanager pod is stuck on OCP 4.11 with OVN in container Creating State From oc describe alertmanager pod: ... Events: Type Reason Age From Message ---- ------ ---- ---- ------- Warning FailedCreatePodSandBox 16s (x459 over 17h) kubelet (combined from similar events): Failed to create pod sandbox: rpc error: code = Unknown desc = failed to create pod network sandbox k8s_alertmanager-managed-ocs-alertmanager-0_openshift-storage_3a55ed54-4eaa-4f65-8a10-e5d21fad1ebc_0(88575547dc0b210307b89dd2bb8e379ece0962b607ac2707a1c2cf630b1aaa78): error adding pod openshift-storage_alertmanager-managed-ocs-alertmanager-0 to CNI network "multus-cni-network": plugin type="multus" name="multus-cni-network" failed (add): [openshift-storage/alertmanager-managed-ocs-alertmanager-0/3a55ed54-4eaa-4f65-8a10-e5d21fad1ebc:ovn-kubernetes]: error adding container to network "ovn-kubernetes": CNI request failed with status 400: '[openshift-storage/alertmanager-managed-ocs-alertmanager-0 88575547dc0b210307b89dd2bb8e379ece0962b607ac2707a1c2cf630b1aaa78] [openshift
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
OCP 4.11 with OVN
How reproducible:
100%
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Terminate the node on which alertmanager pod is running 2. pod will get stuck in container Creating state 3.
Actual results:
AlertManager pod is stuck in container Creating state
Expected results:
Alertmanager pod is ready
Additional info:
The workaround would be to terminate the alertmanager pod
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-4486. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-95. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
In an OpenShift cluster with OpenShiftSDN network plugin with egressIP and NMstate operator configured, there are some conditions when the egressIP is deconfigured from the network interface.
The bug is 100% reproducible.
Steps for reproducing the issue are:
1. Install a cluster with OpenShiftSDN network plugin.
2. Configure egressip for a project.
3. Install NMstate operator.
4. Create a NodeNetworkConfigurationPolicy.
5. Identify on which node the egressIP is present.
6. Restart the nmstate-handler pod running on the identified node.
7. Verify that the egressIP is no more present.
Restarting the sdn pod related to the identified node will reconfigure the egressIP in the node.
This issue has a high impact since any changes triggered for the NMstate operator will prevent application traffic. For example, in the customer environment, the issue is triggered any time a new node is added to the cluster.
The expectation is that NMstate operator should not interfere with SDN configuration.
Description of problem:
Each LB created for a Service type LoadBalancer results in 1 client rule and <# of public subnets> health rules being created. The rules per SG quota in AWS is quite small; 60 by default, and 200 hard max. OCP has about 40 rules OOTB. Assuming an HA cluster in 3 AZs, that is 4 rules per LB. With default AWS quota, only ~5 LBs can be create and with the hard max of 200, only ~40 LBs can be created.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.12
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Create Service type LoadBalancer and observe increase in master-sg and worker-sg rules sets 2. 3.
Actual results:
4 rules are created
Expected results:
1 rules is created when the client rule is a superset of the per-subnet health rules
Additional info:
This ~4x the number of Services of type LoadBalancer. This is required for Hypershift.
Description of problem:
Switching the spec.endpointPublishingStrategy.loadBalancer.scope of the default ingresscontroller results in a degraded ingress operator. The routes using that endpoint like the console URL become inaccessible.
Degraded operators after scope change:
$ oc get co | grep -v ' True False False' NAME VERSION AVAILABLE PROGRESSING DEGRADED SINCE MESSAGE authentication 4.11.4 False False True 72m OAuthServerRouteEndpointAccessibleControllerAvailable: Get "https://oauth-openshift.apps.kartrosa.ukld.s1.devshift.org/healthz": EOF console 4.11.4 False False False 72m RouteHealthAvailable: failed to GET route (https://console-openshift-console.apps.kartrosa.ukld.s1.devshift.org): Get "https://console-openshift-console.apps.kartrosa.ukld.s1.devshift.org": EOF ingress 4.11.4 True False True 65m The "default" ingress controller reports Degraded=True: DegradedConditions: One or more other status conditions indicate a degraded state: CanaryChecksSucceeding=False (CanaryChecksRepetitiveFailures: Canary route checks for the default ingress controller are failing)
We have noticed that each time this happens the underlying AWS loadbalancer gets recreated which is as expected however the router pods probably do not get notified about the new loadbalancer. The instances in the new loadbalancer become 'outOfService'.
Restarting one of the router pods fixes the issue and brings back a couple of instances under the loadbalancer back to 'InService' which leads to the operators becoming happy again.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
ingress in 4.11.z however we suspect this issue to also apply to older versions
How reproducible:
Consistently reproducible
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Create a test OCP 4.11 cluster in AWS 2. Switch the spec.endpointPublishingStrategy.loadBalancer.scope of the default ingresscontroller in openshift-ingress-operator to Internal from External (or vice versa) 3. New Loadbalancer is created in AWS for the default router service, however the instances behind are not in service
Actual results:
ingress, authentication and console operators go into a degraded state. Console URL of the cluster is inaccessible
Expected results:
The ingresscontroller scope transition from internal->External (or vice versa) is smooth without any downtime or operators going into degraded state. The console is accessible.
Description of problem: This is a follow-up to OCPBUGS-2795 and OCPBUGS-2941.
The installer fails to destroy the cluster when the OpenStack object storage omits 'content-type' from responses. This can happen on responses with HTTP status code 204, where a reverse proxy is truncating content-related headers (see this nginX bug report). In such cases, the Installer errors with:
level=error msg=Bulk deleting of container "5ifivltb-ac890-chr5h-image-registry-fnxlmmhiesrfvpuxlxqnkoxdbl" objects failed: Cannot extract names from response with content-type: []
Listing container object suffers from the same issue as listing the containers and this one isn't fixed in latest versions of gophercloud. I've reported https://github.com/gophercloud/gophercloud/issues/2509 and fixing it with https://github.com/gophercloud/gophercloud/issues/2510, however we likely won't be able to backport the bump to gophercloud master back to release-4.8 so we'll have to look for alternatives.
I'm setting the priority to critical as it's causing all our jobs to fail in master.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.8.z
How reproducible:
Likely not happening in customer environments where Swift is exposed directly. We're seeing the issue in our CI where we're using a non-RHOSP managed cloud.
Steps to Reproduce:
1. 2. 3.
Actual results:
Expected results:
Additional info:
Description of problem:
With every pod update we are executing a mutate operation to add the pod port to the port group or add the pod IP to an address set. This functionally doesn't hurt, since mutate will not add duplicate values to the same set. However, this is bad for performance. For example, with a 730 network policies affecting a pod, and issuing 7 pod updates would result in over 5k transactions.
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-1717. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:
Image registry pods panic while deploying OCP in me-central-1 AWS region
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.11.2
How reproducible:
Deploy OCP in AWS me-central-1 region
Steps to Reproduce:
Deploy OCP in AWS me-central-1 region
Actual results:
panic: Invalid region provided: me-central-1
Expected results:
Image registry pods should come up with no errors
Additional info:
Description of problem:
Manual backport of * https://github.com/openshift/cluster-dns-operator/pull/336 * https://github.com/openshift/cluster-dns-operator/pull/339
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.11
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-2508. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:
Installer fails due to Neutron policy error when creating Openstack servers for OCP master nodes. $ oc get machines -A NAMESPACE NAME PHASE TYPE REGION ZONE AGE openshift-machine-api ostest-kwtf8-master-0 Running 23h openshift-machine-api ostest-kwtf8-master-1 Running 23h openshift-machine-api ostest-kwtf8-master-2 Running 23h openshift-machine-api ostest-kwtf8-worker-0-g7nrw Provisioning 23h openshift-machine-api ostest-kwtf8-worker-0-lrkvb Provisioning 23h openshift-machine-api ostest-kwtf8-worker-0-vwrsk Provisioning 23h $ oc -n openshift-machine-api logs machine-api-controllers-7454f5d65b-8fqx2 -c machine-controller [...] E1018 10:51:49.355143 1 controller.go:317] controller/machine_controller "msg"="Reconciler error" "error"="error creating Openstack instance: Failed to create port err: Request forbidden: [POST https://overcloud.redhat.local:13696/v2.0/ports], error message: {\"NeutronError\": {\"type\": \"PolicyNotAuthorized\", \"message\": \"(rule:create_port and (rule:create_port:allowed_address_pairs and (rule:create_port:allowed_address_pairs:ip_address and rule:create_port:allowed_address_pairs:ip_address))) is disallowed by policy\", \"detail\": \"\"}}" "name"="ostest-kwtf8-worker-0-lrkvb" "namespace"="openshift-machine-api"
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.10.0-0.nightly-2022-10-14-023020
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install 4.10 within provider networks (in primary or secondary interface)
Actual results:
Installation failure: 4.10.0-0.nightly-2022-10-14-023020: some cluster operators have not yet rolled out
Expected results:
Successful installation
Additional info:
Please find must-gather for installation on primary interface link here and for installation on secondary interface link here.
Description of problem:
Setting a telemeter proxy in the cluster-monitoring-config config map does not work as expected
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
Steps to Reproduce:
the following KCS details steps to add a proxy.
The steps have been verified at 4.7 but do not work at 4.8, 4.9 or 4.10
https://access.redhat.com/solutions/6172402
When testing at 4.8, 4.9 and 4.10 the proxy setting where also nested under `telemeterClient`
which triggered a telemeter restart but the proxy setting do not get set in the deployment as they do in 4.7
Actual results:
4.8, 4.9 and 4.10 without the nested `telemeterClient`
does not trigger a restart of the telemeter pod
Expected results:
I think the proxy setting should be nested under telemeterClient
but should set the environment variables in the deployment
Additional info:
This is a backport of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2116382 from 4.12 to 4.11.z. Creating manually because as seen in https://github.com/openshift/cluster-monitoring-operator/pull/1743 `/cherry-pick` doesn't work for bugs originally created in bugzilla
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-723. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:
I have a customer who created clusterquota for one of the namespace, it got created but the values were not reflecting under limits or not displaying namespace details.
~~~
$ oc describe AppliedClusterResourceQuota
Name: test-clusterquota
Created: 19 minutes ago
Labels: size=custom
Annotations: <none>
Namespace Selector: []
Label Selector:
AnnotationSelector: map[openshift.io/requester:system:serviceaccount:application-service-accounts:test-sa]
Scopes: NotTerminating
Resource Used Hard
-------- ---- ----
~~~
WORKAROUND: They recreated the clusterquota object (cache it off, delete it, create new) after which it displayed values as expected.
In the past, they saw similar behavior on their test cluster, there it was heavily utilized the etcd DB was much larger in size (>2.5Gi), and had many more objects (at that time, helm secrets were being cached for all deployments, and keeping a history of 10, so etcd was being bombarded).
This cluster the same "symptom" was noticed however etcd was nowhere near that in size nor the amount of etcd objects and/or helm cached secrets.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): OCP 4.9
How reproducible: Occurred only twice(once in test and in current cluster)
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Create ClusterQuota
2. Check AppliedClusterResourceQuota
3. The values and namespace is empty
Actual results: ClusterQuota should display the values
Expected results: ClusterQuota not displaying values
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-2438. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:
On the alert details page and alerting rule details page, clicking on a field that has a popover help throws an uncaught JavaScript error.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Go to Observe > Alerting pages 2. Click on an alert (or go to the rules tab then click on a rule) 3. Click on one of the underlined fields (those that have a popover help)
Actual results:
Expected results:
Additional info:
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-4851. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-4850. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:
Kuryr might take a while to create Pods because it has to create Neutron ports for the pods. If a pod gets deleted while this is being processed, a warning Event will be generated causing the "[sig-network] pods should successfully create sandboxes by adding pod to network" to fail.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
Steps to Reproduce:
1. 2. 3.
Actual results:
Expected results:
Additional info:
When a thin provisioned COW format disk is created on OCP on RHV via CSI driver (a PVC -
https://github.com/openshift/ovirt-csi-driver/blob/master/deploy/example/storage-claim.yaml
But this is thin provisioned disk, so the initial size of the disk should be default of the engine and then grow as needed, it shouldn't be this big.
This causes all the disks created this way to be functionally preallocated (since it eats all that space), which is a real waste of space.
How reproducible: 100%
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Create a storage claim (PVC) in Openshift (
https://github.com/openshift/ovirt-csi-driver/blob/master/deploy/example/storage-claim.yaml
) using the default storage class (or any other storage class with thinProvisioning: "true") and with requested storage i.e. 100Gi
$ oc create -f storage-claim.yaml
2. In the RHV web console navigate to Storage -> Disks and check Virtual size and Actual size of the created disk (PVC)
Actual results:
Disk from our example with requested storage 100GB reports virtual size 100GB and actual size 110 GB.
Expected results:
Thin provisioned disks should start with small initial size and then grow as needed, so its actual size should be considerably smaller (the default initial size set by the engine should be 2.5 GB if I'm not mistaken).
Note: The extra 10GB in the actual size are caused by overhead for the qcow2 disk format, which is 10%, and this was tracked here as a separate issue:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2097139
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-6850. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-6503. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:
While looking into OCPBUGS-5505 I discovered that some 4.10->4.11 upgrade job runs perform an Admin Ack check, while some do not. 4.11 has a ack-4.11-kube-1.25-api-removals-in-4.12 gate, so these upgrade jobs sometimes test that Upgradeable goes false after the ugprade, and sometimes they do not. This is only determined by the polling race condition: the check is executed once per 10 minutes, and we cancel the polling after upgrade is completed. This means that in some cases we are lucky and manage to run one check before the cancel, and sometimes we are not and only check while still on the base version.
Example job that checked admin acks post-upgrade:
https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/origin-ci-test/logs/openshift-cluster-version-operator-880-ci-4.11-upgrade-from-stable-4.10-e2e-azure-upgrade/1611444032104304640
$ curl --silent https://gcsweb-ci.apps.ci.l2s4.p1.openshiftapps.com/gcs/origin-ci-test/logs/openshift-cluster-version-operator-880-ci-4.11-upgrade-from-stable-4.10-e2e-azure-upgrade/1611444032104304640/artifacts/e2e-azure-upgrade/openshift-e2e-test/artifacts/e2e.log | grep 'Waiting for Upgradeable to be AdminAckRequired' Jan 6 21:16:40.153: INFO: Waiting for Upgradeable to be AdminAckRequired ...
Example job that did not check admin acks post-upgrade:
https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/origin-ci-test/logs/openshift-cluster-version-operator-880-ci-4.11-upgrade-from-stable-4.10-e2e-azure-upgrade/1611444033509396480
$ curl --silent https://gcsweb-ci.apps.ci.l2s4.p1.openshiftapps.com/gcs/origin-ci-test/logs/openshift-cluster-version-operator-880-ci-4.11-upgrade-from-stable-4.10-e2e-azure-upgrade/1611444033509396480/artifacts/e2e-azure-upgrade/openshift-e2e-test/artifacts/e2e.log | grep 'Waiting for Upgradeable to be AdminAckRequired'
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.11+ openshift-tests
How reproducible:
nondeterministic, wild guess is ~30% of upgrade jobs
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Inspect the E2E test log of an upgrade jobs and compare the time of the update ("Completed upgrade") with the time of the last check ( "Skipping admin ack", "Gate .* not applicable to current version", "Admin Ack verified') done by the admin ack test
Actual results:
Jan 23 00:47:43.842: INFO: Admin Ack verified Jan 23 00:57:43.836: INFO: Admin Ack verified Jan 23 01:07:43.839: INFO: Admin Ack verified Jan 23 01:17:33.474: INFO: Completed upgrade to registry.build01.ci.openshift.org/ci-op-z09ll8fw/release@sha256:322cf67dc00dd6fa4fdd25c3530e4e75800f6306bd86c4ad1418c92770d58ab8
No check done after the upgrade
Expected results:
Jan 23 00:57:37.894: INFO: Admin Ack verified Jan 23 01:07:37.894: INFO: Admin Ack verified Jan 23 01:16:43.618: INFO: Completed upgrade to registry.build01.ci.openshift.org/ci-op-z8h5x1c5/release@sha256:9c4c732a0b4c2ae887c73b35685e52146518e5d2b06726465d99e6a83ccfee8d Jan 23 01:17:57.937: INFO: Admin Ack verified
One or more checks done after upgrade
OCPBUGS-1251 landed an admin-ack gate in 4.11.z to help admins prepare for Kubernetes 1.25 API removals which are coming in OpenShift 4.12. Poking around in a 4.12.0-ec.2 cluster where APIRemovedInNextReleaseInUse is firing:
$ oc --as system:admin adm must-gather -- /usr/bin/gather_audit_logs $ zgrep -h v1beta1/poddisruptionbudget must-gather.local.1378724704026451055/quay*/audit_logs/kube-apiserver/*.log.gz | jq -r '.verb + " " + (.user | .username + " " + (.extra["authentication.kubernetes.io/pod-name"] | tostr ing))' | sort | uniq -c parse error: Invalid numeric literal at line 29, column 6 28 watch system:serviceaccount:openshift-machine-api:cluster-autoscaler ["cluster-autoscaler-default-5cf997b8d6-ptgg7"]
Finding the source for that container:
$ oc --as system:admin -n openshift-machine-api get -o json pod cluster-autoscaler-default-5cf997b8d6-ptgg7 | jq -r '.status.containerStatuses[].image' quay.io/openshift-release-dev/ocp-v4.0-art-dev@sha256:f81ab7ce0c851ba5e5169bba717cb54716ce5457cbe89d159c97a5c25fd820ed $ oc image info quay.io/openshift-release-dev/ocp-v4.0-art-dev@sha256:f81ab7ce0c851ba5e5169bba717cb54716ce5457cbe89d159c97a5c25fd820ed | grep github SOURCE_GIT_URL=https://github.com/openshift/kubernetes-autoscaler io.openshift.build.commit.url=https://github.com/openshift/kubernetes-autoscaler/commit/1dac0311b9842958ec630273428b74703d51c1c9 io.openshift.build.source-location=https://github.com/openshift/kubernetes-autoscaler
Poking about in the source:
$ git clone --depth 30 --branch master https://github.com/openshift/kubernetes-autoscaler.git
$ cd kubernetes-autoscaler
$ find . -name vendor
./addon-resizer/vendor
./cluster-autoscaler/vendor
./vertical-pod-autoscaler/e2e/vendor
./vertical-pod-autoscaler/vendor
Lots of vendoring. I haven't checked to see how new the client code is in the various vendor packages. But the main issue seems to be the v1beta1 in:
$ git grep policy cluster-autoscaler/core cluster-autoscaler/utils | grep policy.*v1beta1 cluster-autoscaler/core/scaledown/actuation/actuator_test.go: policyv1beta1 "k8s.io/api/policy/v1beta1" cluster-autoscaler/core/scaledown/actuation/actuator_test.go: eviction := createAction.GetObject().(*policyv1beta1.Eviction) cluster-autoscaler/core/scaledown/actuation/drain.go: policyv1 "k8s.io/api/policy/v1beta1" cluster-autoscaler/core/scaledown/actuation/drain_test.go: policyv1 "k8s.io/api/policy/v1beta1" cluster-autoscaler/core/scaledown/legacy/legacy.go: policyv1 "k8s.io/api/policy/v1beta1" cluster-autoscaler/core/scaledown/legacy/wrapper.go: policyv1 "k8s.io/api/policy/v1beta1" cluster-autoscaler/core/scaledown/scaledown.go: policyv1 "k8s.io/api/policy/v1beta1" cluster-autoscaler/core/static_autoscaler_test.go: policyv1 "k8s.io/api/policy/v1beta1" cluster-autoscaler/utils/drain/drain.go: policyv1 "k8s.io/api/policy/v1beta1" cluster-autoscaler/utils/drain/drain_test.go: policyv1 "k8s.io/api/policy/v1beta1" cluster-autoscaler/utils/kubernetes/listers.go: policyv1 "k8s.io/api/policy/v1beta1" cluster-autoscaler/utils/kubernetes/listers.go: v1policylister "k8s.io/client-go/listers/policy/v1beta1"
The main change from v1beta1 to v1 involves spec.selector; I dunno if that's relevant to the autoscaler use-case or not.
Do we run autoscaler CI? I was poking around a bit, but did not find a 4.12 periodic excercising the autoscaler that might have turned up this alert and issue.
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-3235. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Frequently we see the loading state of the topology view, even when there aren't many resources in the project.
Including an example
topology will sometimes hang with the loading indicator showing indefinitely
topology should load consistently without fail
intermittent
4.9
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-4897. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-2500. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem: